Business Model Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Methods

被引:5
|
作者
Gilsing, Rick [1 ]
Turetken, Oktay [2 ]
Grefen, Paul [3 ]
Ozkan, Baris [2 ]
Adali, Onat Ege [4 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, TNO, Strateg Business Anal, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Atos Digital Transformat Consulting, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Eindhoven Univ Technol, ASML, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Business Model Evaluation; Business Model Innovation; Business Model Performance; Systematic Literature Review; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY; TOOLS; INTELLIGENCE; ROBUSTNESS; ECOSYSTEM; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.17705/1pais.14402
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Background: As a result of factors such as digitization and rapid technology change, organizations are compelled to innovate their business models at an accelerated pace. While the domain of business model innovation has focused on understanding and structuring the process of innovation, it offers limited guidance for evaluating business models during the innovation process. Business model evaluation plays a vital role in supporting decision-making about the performance or viability of new business models and motivating continued investments. Existing literature on methods for business model evaluation and their application is limited and available information is scattered. Furthermore, as the BMI process covers a broad spectrum of activities - from business model initiation to implementation - the evaluation challenges and the effectiveness of evaluation methods vary across the phases of innovation. Thus, there is a need for a better understanding on methods for business model evaluation, and their timing and application for business model innovation. Method: Through a systematic literature review, we have investigated the methods available for business model evaluation and focused on understanding their characteristics and effective timing of application in the business model innovation process. Results: We have identified six groups of methods used for business model evaluation. Additionally, we find that early phase business model evaluation is predominantly qualitative in nature, whereas late phases of business model innovation are generally supported through quantitatively-oriented methods. Moreover, we observe that limited evaluation support is available in the literature to support the initiation phase of business model innovation. Based on our findings, we propose a guiding structure for aligning the available methods with the respective innovation phases. Conclusion: The proposed guiding structure offers guidance for business model evaluation in practice and serves as a basis for future research in developing more effective methods and tools for business model evaluation and development.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 61
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Approaches combining methods of Operational Research with Business Process Model and Notation: A systematic review
    Tomaskova, Hana
    Weber, Gerhard-Wilhelm
    [J]. PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2020,
  • [2] Systematic review of research methods: the case of business instruction
    Fiegen, Ann Manning
    [J]. REFERENCE SERVICES REVIEW, 2010, 38 (03) : 385 - +
  • [3] Educational business model: a systematic review of literature
    Duarte, Gwendole Ramos
    Behr, Ariel
    [J]. REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS, 2018, 9 (03): : 95 - 112
  • [4] Business Model Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review
    Kraus, Sascha
    Filser, Matthias
    Puumalainen, Kaisu
    Kailer, Norbert
    Thurner, Selina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (06)
  • [5] Business model and methods of evaluation in sustainable manufacturing
    Wu, Haishang
    [J]. MANUFACTURING REVIEW, 2021, 8
  • [6] Stereo Correspondence Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review
    Vargas, Camilo
    Cabezas, Ivan
    Branch, John W.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN VISUAL COMPUTING, PT II (ISVC 2015), 2015, 9475 : 102 - 111
  • [7] Business Model Archetypes. A Systematic Literature Review
    Madsen, Rita
    Lindgren, Peter
    Durst, Susanne
    [J]. 2022 25TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WIRELESS PERSONAL MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS (WPMC), 2022,
  • [8] The Business Model Paradox: A Systematic Review and Exploration of Antecedents
    Klang, David
    Wallnoefer, Maria
    Hacklin, Fredrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2014, 16 (04) : 454 - 478
  • [9] Current Trends in Usability Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review
    Paz, Freddy
    Antonio Pow-Sang, Jose
    [J]. 2014 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ITS APPLICATIONS (ASEA), 2014, : 11 - 15
  • [10] Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence
    Martin, JL
    Williams, KS
    Abrams, KR
    Turner, DA
    Sutton, AJ
    Chapple, C
    Assassa, RP
    Shaw, C
    Cheater, F
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 10 (06) : 1 - +