Integration of biomass-fueled power plant and MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic comparative analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Akrami, Ehsan [1 ]
Ameri, Mohammad [1 ]
Rocco, Matteo, V [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Mech & Energy Eng, Tehran, Iran
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Via Lambruschini 4, Milan, Italy
关键词
Exergy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; Municipal Solid Waste; Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage; Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell; Waste to energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; EXERGY ANALYSIS; HEAT-RECOVERY; ENERGY; GASIFICATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113304
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) system is emerging as a promising technology to support the development of low carbon power systems. In this context, the present research proposes two scenarios to obtain a biomass-fueled power plant with limited CO2 emissions. A novel combination of a downdraft gasifier (DG), internally fired gas turbine, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC), Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), and cryogenic separation unit, is proposed (named scenario 1) and it is compared to a system in which a bottoming steam cycle (SBC) was used instead of the ORC (named scenario 2). To have a deeper insight into the performance of the integrations, a sensitivity analysis and comparative study have been developed in this research in terms of their thermodynamic and economic performance. Sensitivity analysis explores the effects of significant variables on the proposed system performance: fuel cell current density, fuel cell steam to carbon ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, and CO2 and fuel utilization factors. Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses reveal that the air-preheater in scenario 1 and gasifier in scenario 2 are identified as the component with maximum exergy destruction rate (21% and 14% of total respectively) and HRU in scenario 1 and SBC condenser have the lowest value of the exergoeconomic factor (3.76% and 0.01% respectively) due to high thermodynamic inefficiencies, while MCFC in both scenarios has the highest exergoeconomic factor 87.29% and 80.67% respectively due to its high investment cost. Also, scenario 1 achieves the amount of 83.86 (USD/MW(e)h) for LCOE that is 55.76 (USD/MW(e)h) more than the reference case and 3.55 (USD/MW(e)h) less than the scenario 2.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production
    Akrami, Ehsan
    Ameri, Mohammad
    Rocco, Matteo, V
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 227
  • [2] Low-carbon biomass-fueled integrated system for power, methane and methanol production
    Eisavi, Beneta
    Ranjbar, Faramarz
    Nami, Hossein
    Chitsaz, Ata
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 253
  • [3] Developing an Innovative biomass-based Power Plant for low-carbon Power production: Exergy and Exergoeconomic analyses
    Akrami, Ehsan
    Ameri, Mohammad
    Rocco, Matteo, V
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2020, 19 (19)
  • [4] Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis
    Yang, Ji-chao
    Sobhani, Behrooz
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 222
  • [5] Integration of biomass gasification with a supercritical CO2 and Kalina cycles in a combined heating and power system: A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis
    Ji-chao, Yang
    Sobhani, Behrooz
    [J]. Energy, 2021, 222
  • [6] Low-carbon power generation cycles: the feasibility of CO2 capture and opportunities for integration
    Budzianowski, Wojciech M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 91 (01): : 6 - 13
  • [7] Thermodynamic analysis and profitability study of a power unit with an added CO2 capture plant
    Kowalczyk, Lukasz
    Niegodajew, Pawel
    Stanislaw, Drobniak
    Elsner, Witold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 96 (04): : 276 - 284
  • [8] The impact of the CO2 separation system integration with a 900 MWe power unit on its thermodynamic and economic indices
    Lukowicz, Henryk
    Mroncz, Marcin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 92 : 212 - 220
  • [9] Structure identification of CO2 emission for power system and analysis of its low-carbon contribution
    Chen, Xiaoke
    Zhou, Tianrui
    Li, Xin
    Kang, Chongqing
    Chen, Qixin
    [J]. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36 (02): : 18 - 25
  • [10] Thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a CO2 membrane separation unit integrated into a supercritical coal-fired heat and power plant
    Skorek-Osikowska, Anna
    Bartela, Lukasz
    Kotowicz, Janusz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 95 (03): : 201 - 210