Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Never justified?

被引:9
|
作者
Sorrentino, Luca [1 ]
Sartani, Alessandra [1 ]
Bossi, Daniela [2 ]
Amadori, Rosella [2 ]
Nebuloni, Manuela [3 ,4 ]
Truffi, Marta [4 ]
Bonzini, Matteo [5 ]
Riggio, Eliana [1 ]
Foschi, Diego [1 ,4 ]
Corsi, Fabio [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Luigi Sacco Univ Hosp, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Surg Div, Milan, Italy
[2] ICS Maugeri SpA SB, Dept Surg, Breast Unit, Pavia, Italy
[3] Luigi Sacco Univ Hosp, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Serv Pathol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci Luigi Sacco, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Milan, Italy
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2018年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
breast cancer; DCIS; sentinel lymph node biopsy; upstaging; INVASIVE DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS; DIAGNOSIS; PREDICTORS; CANCER; METASTASIS; MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS; DISSECTION; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1111/tbj.12928
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not standard of care. However, nodal involvement for DCIS patients is reported. Aim of our study was to identify preoperative features predictive of nodal involvement in DCIS patients. We have retrospectively reviewed 175 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS following a vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, and undergoing surgery with sentinel node biopsy. Variables distribution was compared between patients upstaged to invasive cancer at final pathology and patients with a confirmed DCIS, and between positive vs negative sentinel node patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for risk of a positive node. Lymph node biopsy was positive in 13 (7.4%) patients, with 8 (61.5%) macrometastases and 5 (38.5%) micrometastases. In these patients, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) index >4 (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.282-17.224, P = .02), lesion extension 20 mm (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.255-14.447, P = .02), multifocal disease (OR 4.12, 95% CI 0.987-17.174, P = .05), comedo type (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.044-11.969, P = .04), and upstaging (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.080-19.249, P = .04) were all predictive of nodal involvement, although upstaging could not be predicted preoperatively. By multivariate analysis, the only independent factor predictive for positive sentinel node was multifocal disease (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.015-26.066, P < .05). A preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, also including advanced biopsy systems such as vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, may be not always sufficient to exclude patients from sentinel node biopsy. DCIS patients with associated BI-RADS >4, lesion extension 20 mm, comedo type, and above all multifocal disease should be considered for axillary evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 333
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selective sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Is it justified?
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, P.
    De Bonilla Damia, A.
    De Leon Carrillo, J.
    Alvarez Perez, R.
    Jimenez-Hoyuela Garcia, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (SUPPL 1) : S231 - S231
  • [2] Is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) justified?
    Brinkmann, E
    Rademaker, A
    Morrow, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (01) : S57 - S57
  • [3] The role of sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Polom, K.
    Murawa, D.
    Wasiewicz, J.
    Nowakowski, W.
    Murawa, P.
    [J]. EJSO, 2009, 35 (01): : 43 - 47
  • [4] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in Breast ductal carcinoma "in situ"
    Sampol, C.
    Gimenez, M.
    Torrecabota, J.
    Pena, C.
    Serra, C.
    Hernandez, E.
    Canet, R.
    Pozo, A.
    Graner, A.
    Serra, F.
    Galmes, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 : S474 - S474
  • [5] Sentinel node biopsy in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: our experience
    Fernandez-Rodriguez, P.
    De Bonilla Damiá, A.
    Alvarez Perez, R.
    Fernandez Lopez, R.
    Tamayo Carabano, D.
    Jimenez-Hoyuela Garcia, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (SUPPL 1) : S519 - S520
  • [6] Sentinel node biopsy in high risk breast ductal carcinoma in situ
    Ruano, R.
    Ramos, M.
    Gomez-Caminero, F.
    Tamayo, P.
    Garcia-Talavera, P.
    Gonzalez-Orus, J.
    Garcia-Talavera, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 : S372 - S372
  • [7] Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Mehta, A. M.
    Rijna, H.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 294 - 294
  • [8] Benefit of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ
    Rubio, Isabel T.
    Roca, Isabel
    Sabadell, Dolors
    Xercavins, Jordi
    [J]. CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2009, 85 (02): : 92 - 95
  • [9] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast
    Intra, M
    Soteldo, J
    Bassani, G
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (02): : 154 - 154
  • [10] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with a needle core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: is it justified?
    Doyle, B.
    Al-Mudhaffer, M.
    Kennedy, M. M.
    O'Doherty, A.
    Flanagan, F.
    McDermott, E. W.
    Kerin, M. J.
    Hill, A. D.
    Quinn, C. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (06) : 534 - 538