The effect of internal variability on anthropogenic climate projections

被引:11
|
作者
Sorteberg, Asgeir
Kvamsto, Nils Gunnar
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Inst Geophys, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0870.2006.00202.x
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A single model ensemble of five members, with a CO2 increase of 1% per year, has been used to investigate the spread in climate change estimates. It is furthermore explored how this spread is related to internal variability of the climate system and the strength of the CO2 forcing. As expected, the fraction of the globe where a statistically significant climate change could be detected increased with the strength of the CO2 forcing. For temperature this fraction increased rapidly with integration time, while the increase of areas with statistically significant precipitation change was much slower. It is shown that increasing the averaging periods for estimating climate change from 20 to 40 yr reduced the spread due to internal variability by 40% in the Arctic regions. This is due to better sampling of decadal internal variability. In order to reduce sampling uncertainty below a fixed threshold, the number of ensemble members needed is much larger in the polar region than in the lower latitudes. This should be taken into account when designing modelling strategies (high-resolution modelling versus larger number of ensemble members) to reduce uncertainty in future polar climate change. At the time of doubling of CO2, the variance of the climate change estimates, based on 20 yr averages from a single model ensemble, constitutes 13% and 42% of corresponding multimodel ensemble variances for temperature and precipitation, respectively. In the case of precipitation, this indicates that some caution should be used in attributing different climate change estimates to differences in model formulations.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The importance of internal climate variability in climate impact projections
    Schwarzwalda, Kevin
    Lenssena, Nathan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (42)
  • [2] The role of internal climate variability on future streamflow projections
    Faghih, Mina
    Brissette, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 625
  • [3] Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability
    Deser, Clara
    Phillips, Adam
    Bourdette, Vincent
    Teng, Haiyan
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 38 (3-4) : 527 - 546
  • [4] Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability
    Clara Deser
    Adam Phillips
    Vincent Bourdette
    Haiyan Teng
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2012, 38 : 527 - 546
  • [5] The Sensitivity of the Hydrological Cycle to Internal Climate Variability versus Anthropogenic Climate Change
    Kramer, Ryan J.
    Soden, Brian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (10) : 3661 - 3673
  • [6] ENSO Change in Climate Projections: Forced Response or Internal Variability?
    Maher, N.
    Matei, D.
    Milinski, S.
    Marotzke, J.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (20) : 11390 - 11398
  • [7] Relative Importance of Internal Climate Variability versus Anthropogenic Climate Change in Global Climate Change
    Chen, Jie
    Li, Xiangquan
    Martel, Jean-Luc
    Brissette, Francois P.
    Zhang, Xunchang J.
    Frei, Allan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (02) : 465 - 478
  • [8] Internal variability as a cause of qualitative intermodel disagreement on anthropogenic climate changes
    Räisänen, J
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 1999, 64 (1-2) : 1 - 13
  • [9] Internal Variability as a Cause of Qualitative Intermodel Disagreement on Anthropogenic Climate Changes
    J. Räisänen
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 1999, 64 : 1 - 13
  • [10] Uncertainty in Climate Change Projections of the Hadley Circulation: The Role of Internal Variability
    Kang, Sarah M.
    Deser, Clara
    Polvani, Lorenzo M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (19) : 7541 - 7554