Milestone assessment of minimally invasive surgery in Pediatric Urology fellowship programs

被引:4
|
作者
Smith, P. H., III [1 ]
Carpenter, M. [1 ,2 ]
Herbst, K. W. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr, Div Urol, Suite 2E,282 Washington St, Hartford, CT 06106 USA
[2] Connecticut Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Res, Hartford, CT USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Farmington, CT USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Pediatric urology; Training; Learning curve; Milestone; LEARNING-CURVE; ROBOTIC SURGERY; PYELOPLASTY; SIMULATOR; SKILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.012
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Introduction Minimally invasive surgery has become an important aspect of Pediatric Urology fellowship training. In 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education published the Pediatric Urology Milestone Project as a metric of fellow proficiency in multiple facets of training, including laparoscopic/robotic procedures. Objective The present study assessed trends in minimally invasive surgery training and utilization of the Milestones among recent Pediatric Urology fellows. Study design Using an electronic survey instrument, Pediatric Urology fellowship program directors and fellows who completed their clinical year in 2015 were surveyed. Participants were queried regarding familiarity with the Milestone Project, utilization of the Milestones, robotic/laparoscopic case volume and training experience, and perceived competency with robotic/laparoscopic surgery at the start and end of the fellowship clinical year according to Milestone criteria. Responses were accepted between August and November 2015. Results Surveys were distributed via e-mail to 35 fellows and 30 program directors. Sixteen fellows (46%) and 14 (47%) program directors responded. All fellows reported some robotic experience prior to fellowship, and 69% performed > 50 robotic/laparoscopic surgeries during residency. Fellow robotic/laparoscopic case volume varied: three had 1-10 cases (19%), four had 11-20 cases (25%), and nine had > 20 cases (56%). Supplementary or robotic training modalities included simulation (9), animal models (6), surgical videos (7), and courses (2). Comparison of beginning and end of fellowship robotic/laparoscopic Milestone assessment (Summary Fig.) revealed scores of < 3 in (10) 62% of fellow self-assessments and 10 (75%) of program director assessments. End of training Milestone scores > 4 were seen in 12 (75%) of fellow self-assessment and eight (57%) of program director assessments. Discussion An improvement in robotic/laparoscopic Milestone scores by both fellow self-assessment and program director assessment was observed during the course of training; however, 43% of program directors rated their fellow below the graduation target of a Milestone score of 4. Conclusion The best ways to teach minimally invasive surgery in fellowship training must be critically considered.
引用
收藏
页码:110.e1 / 110.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survey of minimally invasive surgery fellowship programs
    Madan, AK
    Frantzides, CT
    Deziel, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 16 (02): : 99 - 104
  • [2] Pediatric anesthesia for minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology
    Spinelli, Gianmario
    Vargas, Maria
    Aprea, Gianfranco
    Cortese, Giuseppe
    Servillo, Giuseppe
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2016, 5 (04): : 214 - 221
  • [3] Instrumentation for minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology
    Gobbi, Dalia
    Midrio, Paola
    Gamba, Piergiorgio
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2016, 5 (04): : 186 - 204
  • [4] "Open" minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology
    Hidalgo-Tamola, Josephine
    Shnorhavorian, Margarett
    Koyle, Martin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2009, 5 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [5] Can endourology fellowship training enhance minimally invasive surgery in urology practice?
    Al-Kandari, Ahmed M.
    Elshebiny, Yehya
    Ibrahim, Hamdy
    AlShammari, Ahmad
    Shokeir, Ahmed A.
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 14 (04) : 275 - 279
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Urology Adaptations and New Frontiers
    Sheth, Kunj R.
    Van Batavia, Jason P.
    Bowen, Diana K.
    Koh, Chester J.
    Srinivasan, Arun K.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (04) : 611 - +
  • [7] A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY IN PEDIATRIC UROLOGY
    Aksenov, Leonid
    Granberg, Candace
    Gargollo, Patricio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E910 - E911
  • [8] Minimally invasive surgery in urology
    Graber, P
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [9] Commentary to "Open' minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology" Ought we not (re)define minimally invasive surgery?
    Harper, Luke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2010, 6 (01) : 95 - 95
  • [10] Minimally invasive surgery: The evolution of fellowship
    Park, Adrian
    Kavic, Stephen M.
    Lee, Tommy H.
    Heniford, B. Todd
    [J]. SURGERY, 2007, 142 (04) : 505 - 511