Physical vs. Virtual Agent Embodiment and Effects on Social Interaction

被引:40
|
作者
Thellman, Sam [1 ]
Silvervarg, Annika [1 ]
Gulz, Agneta [1 ]
Ziemke, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
关键词
Embodiment; Physical presence; Social presence; Social influence; Social robots; Virtual agents;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_44
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Previous work indicates that physical robots elicit more favorable social responses than virtual agents. These effects have been attributed to the physical embodiment. However, a recent meta-analysis by Li [1] suggests that the benefits of robots are due to physical presence rather than physical embodiment. To further explore the importance of presence we conducted a pilot study investigating the relationship between physical and social presence. The results suggest that social presence of an artificial agent is important for interaction with people, and that the extent to which it is perceived as socially present might be unaffected by whether it is physically or virtually present.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 415
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative Measurement of Virtual vs. Physical Object Embodiment through Kinesthetic Figural After Effects
    Alzayat, Ayman
    Hancock, Mark
    Nacenta, Miguel A.
    32ND ANNUAL ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2014), 2014, : 2903 - 2912
  • [2] Exploring Perception and Preference in Public Human-Agent Interaction: Virtual Human Vs. Social Robot
    Purps, Christian Felix
    Hettmann, Wladimir
    Zylowski, Thorsten
    Sautchuk-Patricio, Nathalia
    Hepperle, Daniel
    Woelfel, Matthias
    ARTSIT, INTERACTIVITY AND GAME CREATION, PT 2, ARTSIT 2023, 2024, 565 : 342 - 358
  • [3] Proteus vs. social identity effects on virtual brainstorming
    Buisine, Stephanie
    Guegan, Jerome
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 39 (05) : 594 - 606
  • [4] The Role of Interaction in Virtual Embodiment: Effects of the Virtual Hand Representation
    Argelaguet, Ferran
    Hoyet, Ludovic
    Trico, Michael
    Lecuyer, Anatole
    2016 IEEE VIRTUAL REALITY CONFERENCE (VR), 2016, : 3 - 10
  • [5] Effects of Posture and Embodiment on Social Distance in Human-Agent Interaction in Mixed Reality
    Li, Chengjie
    Androulakaki, Theofronia
    Gao, Alex Yuan
    Yang, Fangkai
    Saikia, Himangshu
    Peters, Christopher
    Skantze, Gabriel
    18TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS (IVA'18), 2018, : 191 - 196
  • [6] Joint action with a virtual robotic vs. human agent
    Bunlon, Frederique
    Gazeau, Jean-Pierre
    Colloud, Floren
    Marshall, Peter J.
    Bouquet, Cedric A.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 816 - 827
  • [7] The Physical-Virtual Table: Exploring the Effects of a Virtual Human's Physical Influence on Social Interaction
    Lee, Myungho
    Norouzi, Nahal
    Bruder, Gerd
    Wisniewski, Pamela J.
    Welch, Gregory F.
    24TH ACM SYMPOSIUM ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY (VRST 2018), 2018,
  • [8] Physical embodiment vs. smartphone: which influences presence and anthropomorphism most in telecommunication?
    Yun, Nungduk
    Yamada, Seiji
    2022 31ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN 2022), 2022, : 1065 - 1070
  • [9] Differences in social interaction- vs. cocaine reward in mouse vs. rat
    Kummer, Kai K.
    Hofhansel, Lena
    Barwitz, Constanze M.
    Schardl, Aurelia
    Prast, Janine M.
    Salti, Ahmad
    El Rawas, Rana
    Zernig, Gerald
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8 : 1 - 7
  • [10] Differences Between Physical vs. Virtual Evoked Vestibular Responses
    Mehrangiz Ashiri
    Brian Lithgow
    Abdelbaset Suleiman
    Brian Blakley
    Behzad Mansouri
    Zahra Moussavi
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 48 : 1241 - 1255