Optical coherence tomography segmentation analysis in relapsing remitting versus progressive multiple sclerosis

被引:43
|
作者
Behbehani, Raed [1 ,2 ]
Abu Al-Hassan, Abdullah [1 ]
Al-Salahat, Ali [1 ]
Sriraman, Devarajan [3 ]
Oakley, J. D. [4 ]
Alroughani, Raed [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ibn Sina Hosp, Al Bahar Ophthalmol Ctr, Kuwait, Kuwait
[2] Dasman Inst, Neurol Clin, Dasman, Kuwait
[3] Dasman Inst, Natl Dasman Diabet Biobank, Dasman, Kuwait
[4] Voxeleron LLC, Pleasanton, CA USA
[5] Amiri Hosp, Div Neurol, Sharq, Kuwait
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; PATHOLOGY; NEURITIS; MS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0172120
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Optical coherence tomography (OCT) with retinal segmentation analysis is a valuable tool in assessing axonal loss and neuro-degeneration in multiple sclerosis ( MS) by in-vivo imaging, delineation and quantification of retinal layers. There is evidence of deep retinal involvement in MS beyond the inner retinal layers. The ultra-structural retinal changes in MS in different MS phenotypes can reflect differences in the pathophysiologic mechanisms. There is limited data on the pattern of deeper retinal layer involvement in progressive MS (PMS) versus relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). We have compared the OCT segmentation analysis in patients with relapsing-remitting MS and progressive MS. Methods Cross-sectional study of 113 MS patients (226 eyes) (29 PMS, 84 RRMS) and 38 healthy controls (72 eyes). Spectral domain OCT (SDOCT) using the macular cube acquisition protocol (Cirrus HDOCT 5000; Carl Zeiss Meditec) and segmentation of the retinal layers for quantifying the thicknesses of the retinal layers. Segmentation of the retinal layers was carried out utilizing Orion software (Voxeleron, USA) for quantifying the thicknesses of individual retinal layers. Results The retinal nerve finer layer (RNFL) (p = 0.023), the ganglion-cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) (p = 0.006) and the outer plexiform layer (OPL) (p = 0.033) were significantly thinner in PMS compared to RRMS. There was significant negative correlation between the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and EDSS (r = -0.554, p = 0.02) in PMS patients. In RRMS patients with prior optic neuritis, the GCIPL correlated negatively (r = -0.317; p = 0.046), while the photoreceptor layer (PR) correlated positively with EDSS (r = 0.478; p = 0.003). Conclusions Patients with PMS exhibit more atrophy of both the inner and outer retinal layers than RRMS. The ONL in PMS and the GCIPL and PR in RRMS can serve as potential surrogate of disease burden and progression (EDSS). The specific retinal layer predilection and its correlation with disability may reflect different pathophysiologic mechanisms and various stages of progression in MS.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation Analysis in Relapsing Remitting versus Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
    Behbehani, Raed
    AL-Hassan, Abdullah
    Al-Salahat, Ali
    Sriraman, Devarajan
    Oakley, Jonathan
    Airoughani, Raed
    NEUROLOGY, 2017, 88
  • [2] Fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography changes in patients with primary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Kisza, K. J.
    Affel, E. L.
    Sergott, R. C.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2011, 17 : S493 - S493
  • [3] Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders or relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Tiftikcioglu, B. I.
    Emre, S.
    Idiman, F.
    Idiman, E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 : 647 - 647
  • [4] Human herpesviruses in primary progressive versus relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients
    Dominguez Mozo, Maria Inmaculada
    Garcia Martinez, Maria Angel
    Rodriguez-Garcia, Carla
    Ortega-Madueno, Isabel
    Villar Guimerans, Luisa Maria
    Costa-Frossard, Lucienne
    Villarrubia, Noelia
    Aladro-Benito, Yolanda
    Pilo De La Fuente, Belen
    Montalban, Xavier
    Comabella, Manuel
    Gonzalez-Suarez, Ines
    Casanova Peno, Ignacio
    Martinez Gines, Maria Luisa
    Garcia Dominguez, Jose Manuel
    Arroyo, Rafael
    Alvarez-Lafuente, Roberto
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (03) : 241 - 242
  • [5] Longitudinal study with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in treated patients with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
    Diaz-Diaz, J.
    Merino Diez, M. T.
    Estefania Hidalgo, L.
    Valls Carbo, A.
    Noval Martin, S.
    Capote Diez, M.
    Gonzalez-Suarez, I.
    Gomez Estevez, I.
    Sanchez Jean, R.
    Oreja-Guevara, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 208 - 209
  • [6] Longitudinal Assessment of Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Relapsing -Remitting Multiple Sclerosis on Interferon beta-1a
    Wong, Ka-Ho
    Bacharach, Rae
    Fjeldstad, Anette
    Klein, Julia
    Soldan, M. Paz
    Rose, John
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98 (18)
  • [7] Sector-specific macular volume compromise in relapsing & remitting multiple sclerosis as measured by optical coherence tomography
    Fjeldstad, A. S.
    Rose, J. W.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 362 - 362
  • [8] Optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correlates with cognitive impairment in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Lichtman-Mikol, S.
    Razmjou, S.
    Bao, F.
    Yarraguntla, K.
    Reed, S.
    Sweidan, W.
    Sood, R.
    Santiago, C.
    Seraji-Bozorgzad, N.
    Bernitsas, E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 : 564 - 565
  • [9] Sensitivity of visual evoked potentials and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
    Behbehani, Raed
    Ahmed, Samar
    Al-Hashel, Jasem
    Rousseff, Rossen T.
    Alroughani, Raed
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2017, 12 : 15 - 19
  • [10] Neuropsychological differences between types of multiple sclerosis: relapsing remitting versus primary progressive
    De-la-Pena, Cristina
    Parra-Bolanos, Nicolas
    Bernabeu-Brotons, Elena
    Fernandez-Medina, Juliana
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE NEUROCIENCIA, 2020, 21 (05): : 192 - 198