The assessment of depression in the postnatal period: A comparison of four self-report questionnaires

被引:31
|
作者
Condon, JT
Corkindale, CJ
机构
[1] Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park
来源
关键词
assessment; depression; postnatal;
D O I
10.3109/00048679709073844
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the degree of agreement between four self-report depression scales, with particular emphasis on whether each scale would identify the same subgroup of women as being 'most depressed'. Method: The questionnaires were administered to a sample of approximately 200 postnatal women at 4 weeks, 4 months and 8 months after delivery. The instruments were: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale; and the depression subscale of the Profile of Mood States. Results: Agreement between pairs of instruments, in terms of identifying the most depressed subgroup of women in the cohort, only averaged approximately 40%. Agreement between the three instruments was only about 25%. Conclusions: This poor level of agreement most likely reflects the different emphasis in item content of the questionnaires, which in turn reflects different notions of 'depression' held by the designers of the instruments. The implications of the findings for research and clinical practice are discussed.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring orthorexia nervosa: A comparison of four self-report questionnaires
    Meule, Adrian
    Holzapfel, Christina
    Brandl, Beate
    Greetfeld, Martin
    Hessler-Kaufmann, Johannes Baltasar
    Skurk, Thomas
    Quadflieg, Norbert
    Schlegl, Sandra
    Hauner, Hans
    Voderholzer, Ulrich
    APPETITE, 2020, 146
  • [2] Case identification of depression with self-report questionnaires
    Sheeran, T
    Zimmerman, M
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2002, 109 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [3] Scoring rules and rating formats of Self-report Depression Questionnaires: A comparison of approaches
    Zimmerman, Mark
    D'Avanzato, Catherine
    Attiullah, Naureen
    Friedman, Michael
    Toba, Cristina
    Boerescu, Daniela A.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2014, 218 (1-2) : 225 - 228
  • [4] Readability assessment of self-report hyperacusis questionnaires
    Margol-Gromada, Magdalena
    Sereda, Magdalena
    Baguley, David M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (07) : 506 - 512
  • [5] PITFALLS IN SELF-REPORT ASSESSMENT OF DEPRESSION
    PRUSOFF, BA
    KLERMAN, GL
    PAYKEL, ES
    CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1972, 17 : S101 - S107
  • [6] Addressing overestimation of the prevalence of depression based on self-report screening questionnaires
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Kwakkenbos, Linda
    Levis, Alexander W.
    Benedetti, Andrea
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (02) : E44 - E49
  • [7] Understanding Indecisiveness: Dimensionality of Two Self-Report Questionnaires and Associations With Depression and Indecision
    Hallenbeck, Haijing Wu
    Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
    Thompson, Renee J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (02) : 176 - 187
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy for major depression in multiple sclerosis using self-report questionnaires
    Fischer, Anja
    Fischer, Marcus
    Nicholls, Robert A.
    Lau, Stephanie
    Poettgen, Jana
    Patas, Kostas
    Heesen, Christoph
    Gold, Stefan M.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 5 (09):
  • [10] The assessment of rheumatoid arthritis and the acceptability of self-report questionnaires in clinical practice
    Wolfe, F
    Pincus, T
    Thompson, AK
    Doyle, J
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2003, 49 (01): : 59 - 63