Short-term outcomes of traction-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

被引:16
|
作者
Xia, Mengting [1 ]
Zhou, Yunfeng [2 ,3 ]
Yu, Jiajie [4 ]
Chen, Wenwen [4 ]
Huang, Xiaotao [1 ]
Liao, Juan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Thorac Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 4, 16,Sect 3, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Gastroenterol, 16,Sect 3, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); Traction; Superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms; Meta-analysis; EARLY GASTRIC-CANCER; MUCOSAL RESECTION; CLIP; EFFICACY; RING;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-019-1639-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn recent years, some traction-assisted approaches have been introduced to facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures by reducing the procedure time and risks related to the procedure. However, the relative advantages of traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (T-ESD) are still being debated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of T-ESD for the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library up to March 31, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing T-ESD and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. The main endpoints are en bloc resection, complete resection, procedure time, perforation, and delayed bleeding. Pooled risk ratio (RR), Peto odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) were calculated to compare T-ESD and C-ESD. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018108135.ResultsA total of 7 RCTs with 1007 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between the T-ESD and C-ESD groups in the pooled estimate of en bloc resection, complete resection, and delayed bleeding (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.99, 1.01, I-2=0%, P=0.66; RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.98, 1.03, I-2=0%, P=0.81; OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.48, 1.86, I-2=19%, P=0.87,respectively). The pooled estimate indicated that the procedure time was significantly shorter in the T-ESD group (MD=-16.19, 95% CI -29.24, -3.13, I-2=87%, P=0.02) than in the C-ESD group. Compared to C-ESD, T-ESD was associated with lower incidence of perforation (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.91, I-2=0%, P=0.03).ConclusionsT-ESD is a safe and effective treatment option with a low perforation rate and shorter procedure time than C-ESD for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Future multi-center (including European populations), randomized controlled trials of larger sample size and long-term outcomes of T-ESD are required.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-term outcomes of traction-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Mengting Xia
    Yunfeng Zhou
    Jiajie Yu
    Wenwen Chen
    Xiaotao Huang
    Juan Liao
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 17
  • [2] Conventional Versus Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal, Gastric, and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Nunes, Felipe Giacobo
    Gomes, Igor Logetto Caetite
    Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De
    Dominguez, Juan Eduardo G.
    Fornari, Fernando
    Ribeiro, Igor Braga
    Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola P.
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Moura, Eduardo G. Hourneaux
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [3] Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Yoshida, Masao
    Takizawa, Kohei
    Suzuki, Sho
    Koike, Yoshiki
    Nonaka, Satoru
    Yamasaki, Yasushi
    Minagawa, Takeyoshi
    Sato, Chiko
    Takeuchi, Chihiro
    Watanabe, Ko
    Kanzaki, Hiromitsu
    Morimoto, Hiroyuki
    Yano, Takafumi
    Sudo, Kosuke
    Mori, Keita
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (05) : 1231 - 1240
  • [4] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD): ARE TRACTION-ASSISTED METHODS SUPERIOR TO CONVENTIONAL ESD? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Nunes, Felipe
    Peixoto De Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique
    Hemerly, Matheus
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Landim, Davi
    Hirsch, Bruno Salomao
    Fornari, Fernando
    Aguirre, Diego Cadena
    Bernardo, Wanderley
    De Moura, Eduardo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB722 - AB723
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection With Traction-Assisted Method in Comparison to Conventional Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abosheaishaa, Hazem
    Awad, Abdelaziz A.
    Sharaf, Mohamed S.
    Marey, Mohamed Mahmoud.
    Hassan, Malak A.
    Nassar, Mahmoud
    Abdelhalim, Omar
    Mohamed, Islam
    Elfert, Khaled
    Salem, Ahmed E.
    Abomhya, Ahmed
    Andrawes, Sherif
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1121 - S1122
  • [6] Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of superficial gastric neoplasms in non-Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Benites-Goni, Harold
    Palacios-Salas, Fernando
    Marin-Calderon, Luis
    Diaz-Arocutipa, Carlos
    Piscoya, Alejandro
    Hernandez, Adrian, V
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, : 167 - 177
  • [7] Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Singh, Sahib
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Sharma, Neil
    Vinayek, Rakesh
    Dutta, Sudhir
    Kantsevoy, Sergey V.
    Le, Michelle
    Adler, Douglas G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 58 (10) : 1016 - 1021
  • [8] Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for large esophageal cancers: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video)
    Yoshida, Masao
    Takizawa, Kohei
    Nonaka, Satoru
    Shichijo, Satoki
    Suzuki, Sho
    Sato, Chiko
    Komori, Hiroyuki
    Minagawa, Takeyoshi
    Oda, Ichiro
    Uedo, Noriya
    Hirasawa, Kingo
    Matsumoto, Kenshi
    Suiniyoshi, Tetsuya
    Mori, Keita
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Ono, Hiroyuki
    Kusano, Chika
    Takeda, Tsutomu
    Fujli, Ryoji
    Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
    Yamasaki, Yasushi
    Minashi, Keiko
    Nakajima, Takako
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (01) : 55 - +
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Jia-Xi
    Liu, De-Liang
    Tan, Yu-Yong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (05) : 935 - 943
  • [10] CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF TRACTION-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR PYLORIC NEOPLASMS: PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS
    Hong, Seung Min
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Lee, Bong Eun
    Song, Geun Am
    Lee, Moon Won
    Joo, Dong Chan
    Baek, Dong Hoon
    Lee, Jonghyun
    Yi, Kiyoun
    Lee, Hye Young
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB235 - AB235