Understanding the genetic relationships and breeding patterns of Sri Lankan tea cultivars with genomic and EST-SSR markers

被引:8
|
作者
Karunarathna, K. H. T. [1 ]
Mewan, K. M. [2 ]
Weerasena, O. V. D. S. J. [1 ]
Perera, S. A. C. N. [3 ]
Edirisinghe, E. N. U. [2 ]
Jayasoma, A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colombo, Inst Biochem Mol Biol & Biotechnol, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[2] Tea Res Inst Sri Lanka, Biochem Div, Thalawakelle, Sri Lanka
[3] Univ Peradeniya, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Biol, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
关键词
Camellia sinensis; Genetic diversity; Improved cultivars; Plant breeding; Population structure; Selection; CLASSIFICATION; DIVERSITY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2018.05.051
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Sri Lanka is the second largest global tea exporter. Genetically diverse planting material are vital in adjusting for biotic and abiotic stresses. Accordingly, sixty four tea cultivars, which represent the entirety of the recommended cultivars consisting of 50 improved cultivars and 14 Estate selections were analyzed at 33 Genomic and EST-SSR loci with the objective of assessing the genetic diversity and population structure of cultivated tea in Sri Lanka. Genotypic data were subjected to cluster and population structure analysis using power marker and Structure software. The results revealed three groups in the dendrogram and the population structure was described at the level of three sub-populations; the main sub-populations deriving from a single Assam type tea plant and the other two from old seedling teas and the hybrids between the above sub-populations. The cultivated tea in Sri Lanka were thus revealed to be of vary narrow genetic base dominated by the Assam type tea of Indo-Chinese origin. In conclusion, it is urged for enhancing the genetic diversity of the cultivated tea by incorporating exotic China type tea germplasm and more parents from old seedling teas grown in Sri Lanka in the breeding programme.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing EST-SSR Markers for Gerbera Breeding and Genetic Analysis
    Gong, Li
    Deng, Zhanao
    HORTSCIENCE, 2009, 44 (04) : 1153 - 1153
  • [2] Comparison of genomic SSR and EST-SSR markers for estimating genetic diversity in cucumber
    Hu, J.
    Wang, L.
    Li, J.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2011, 55 (03) : 577 - 580
  • [3] Differences of EST-SSR and genomic-SSR markers in assessing genetic diversity in poplar
    SONG Yue-peng 1
    Forest Ecosystems, 2012, (01) : 1 - 7
  • [4] Identification of wheat cultivars using EST-SSR markers
    Fujita, Yumiko
    Fukuoka, Hiroyuki
    Yano, Hiroshi
    BREEDING SCIENCE, 2009, 59 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [5] Development and transferability of EST-SSR and transferability of genomic SSR markers for genetic diversity assessment of Doritis
    Jantasuriyarat, Chatchawan
    Ritchuay, Savitree
    Pattarawat, Pawat
    Huehne, Pattana Srifah
    Kate-Ngam, Sureeporn
    BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 45 : 57 - 65
  • [6] Comparison of relative efficiency of genomic SSR and EST-SSR markers in estimating genetic diversity in sugarcane
    S. Parthiban
    P. Govindaraj
    S. Senthilkumar
    3 Biotech, 2018, 8
  • [7] Comparison of relative efficiency of genomic SSR and EST-SSR markers in estimating genetic diversity in sugarcane
    Parthiban, S.
    Govindaraj, P.
    Senthilkumar, S.
    3 BIOTECH, 2018, 8
  • [8] Analysis of diversity and relationships among Chinese orchid cultivars using EST-SSR markers
    Huang, Yan
    Li, Fang
    Chen, Kunsong
    BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY, 2010, 38 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [9] EST-SSR markers reveal synonymies, homonymies and relationships inconsistent with putative pedigrees in chestnut cultivars
    McCleary, Tim
    McAllister, Mary
    Coggeshall, Mark
    Romero-Severson, Jeanne
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2013, 60 (04) : 1209 - 1222
  • [10] EST-SSR markers reveal synonymies, homonymies and relationships inconsistent with putative pedigrees in chestnut cultivars
    Tim McCleary
    Mary McAllister
    Mark Coggeshall
    Jeanne Romero-Severson
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2013, 60 : 1209 - 1222