Planning for success: Leveraging two ecosystem models to support development of an Antarctic marine protected area

被引:7
|
作者
Dahood, Adrian [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Klein, Emily S. [1 ,5 ]
Watters, George M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Antarctic Ecosyst Res Div, Southwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, 8901 La Jolla Shores Dr, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Inst Marine Sci, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Farallon Inst, 101 H St, Petaluma, CA 94952 USA
[4] Calif Nat Resources Agcy, Calif Ocean Protect Council, 1416 Ninth St,Suite 1311, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[5] Boston Univ, Frederick S Pardee Ctr Study Longer Range Future, 67 Bay State Rd, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Antarctic; Marine protected area; Ecosystem model; Multi-model inference; Decision support; Science for policy advice; KRILL FISHERY; UNCERTAINTY; PARAMETERS; PENINSULA; ECOPATH; OPTIONS; ECOSIM;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Efforts are underway to forward a marine protected area (MPA) in the Western Antarctic Peninsula, guided by an internationally agreed framework of protected area objectives. Preliminary MPA boundaries were evaluated against some of these objectives using a static, map-based process, yet further assessment and additional objectives could be addressed with dynamic approaches. Here, the MPA's evaluation was expanded using the joint application of two published dynamic ecosystem models to further appraise the MPA. These models also considered potential impacts of climate change in the region, and greater insight can be gained from using them together rather than independently. Both models projected the proposed MPA could increase ecosystem viability in the region by reducing potential population declines, especially of penguins. These benefits manifested even when the impacts of climate change occurred over the long term, and likely accrued due to protection of areas important for krill aggregation and predator foraging. Model outcomes also suggested possible improvements to the preliminary MPA boundaries to reinforce these benefits. Using the two structurally distinct models together increased confidence in results and the potential for an MPA to meet multiple policy objectives in the region, and the paper further details the process of translating outcomes into timely decision support for stakeholders. Modelling results were regularly communicated using established formal and informal channels, ensuring modelderived advice directly supported policy needs. Collectively, the work demonstrates the process and value of leveraging existing ecosystem models, quickly adapting models to policy needs, and developing actionable advice for policy makers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder perceptions of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources Marine Protected Area planning process
    Boothroyd, Anne
    Adams, Vanessa
    Alexander, Karen
    Hill, Nicole
    MARINE POLICY, 2024, 170
  • [2] Integrating distribution models and habitat classification maps into marine protected area planning
    Ferrari, Renata
    Malcolm, Hamish
    Neilson, Joe
    Lucieer, Vanessa
    Jordan, Alan
    Ingleton, Tim
    Figueira, Will
    Johnstone, Nicola
    Hill, Nicole
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 212 : 40 - 50
  • [3] Contributions of marine infrastructures to marine planning and protected area networking
    Shabtay, Ateret
    Portman, Michelle E.
    Carmel, Yohay
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 28 (04) : 830 - 839
  • [4] Lessons for marine conservation planning: A comparison of three marine protected area planning processes
    Osmond, Michael
    Airame, Satie
    Caldwell, Margaret
    Day, Jon
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (02) : 41 - 51
  • [5] Experience with marine protected area planning and management in the Philippines
    White, AT
    Courtney, CA
    Salamanca, A
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [6] Planning a marine protected area at Chinwan, Penghu, Taiwan
    Shih, Yi-Che
    Chiau, Wen-Yan
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (08) : 433 - 438
  • [7] Seabed Mapping for Marine Protected Area Planning and Monitoring
    Davies, Peter
    Jordan, Alan
    Mesley, Edwina
    SEA TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 51 (08) : 19 - +
  • [8] Evaluating the success of a marine protected area: A systematic review approach
    Gallacher, J.
    Simmonds, N.
    Fellowes, H.
    Brown, N.
    Gill, N.
    Clark, W.
    Biggs, C.
    Rodwell, L. D.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 183 : 280 - 293
  • [9] Blue carbon storage in a sub-Antarctic marine protected area
    Bergagna, Lucia
    Lovrich, Gustavo
    Riccialdelli, Luciana
    Sahade, Ricardo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [10] Ecosystem consideration in conservation planning:: energy demand of foraging bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus) in a marine protected area
    Hooker, SK
    Whitehead, H
    Gowans, S
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 104 (01) : 51 - 58