Formation mechanism and step effect analysis of the crop gray water footprint in rice production

被引:7
|
作者
Wu, Mengyang [1 ]
Cao, Xinchun [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Jie [1 ]
Shu, Rui [1 ]
Zeng, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Key Lab Efficient Irrigat Drainage & Agr Soil Wat, Minist Educ, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crop gray water footprint; Nitrogen transportation; Time step; Field observation; ANTHROPOGENIC NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; FIELDS; TRADE; GREEN; WHEAT; BLUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141897
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gray water footprint (GWF) is a simple and efficient indicator to quantify water pollution that has received extensive attention. Previously, an agricultural GWF was estimated by assuming the nitrogen loss rate throughout the crop cycle, while the field chemicals accompanying water movement during crop growth were not considered. In this study, using field observations of water and nitrogen transport in Nanjing, China, the GWF was calculated at the time steps of a day (GWFd), sub-growth period (GWF(s)), and whole crop season (GWF(w)), and its formation mechanism and step effect in rice production were explored. Field drainage and leakage caused nitrogen loss and generated a GWF, with the latter occurring intermittently. The values of GWFd, GWFs, and GWFw from 2015 to 2018 were 0.42, 0.38, and 0.31 m(3)/kg, respectively, and the step effect exists temporally for the rice GWF. The GWF of paddy rice growth decreased as the measurement period increased and the time step was calculated using GWFd as a reference. Herein, it was determined that the GWFw used in previous studies may have greatly underestimated the adverse impact of the GWF on water quality, particularly in humid regions or years. Therefore, it is essential to identify the formation mechanism and appropriately select the time steps for GWF evaluation during rice production. This research provides methodological references for GWF assessment and reduction in crop production systems. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of Irrigation and Drainage Modes on Crop Water Footprint in Rice Production
    Wu, Mengyang
    Cao, Xinchun
    Ren, Jie
    [J]. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (01): : 256 - 262
  • [2] Life cycle water footprint analysis of crop production in China
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Ji, Changxing
    Bai, Yueyang
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 256
  • [3] Variation and driving mechanism analysis of water footprint efficiency in crop cultivation in China
    Cao, Xinchun
    Shu, Rui
    Ren, Jie
    Wu, Mengyang
    Huang, Xuan
    Guo, Xiangping
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 725
  • [4] Factors affecting crop production water footprint: A review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Qian
    Huang, Kai
    Liu, Hui
    Yu, Yajuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 36 : 207 - 216
  • [5] Driving factor analysis of spatial and temporal variations in the gray water footprint of crop production via multiple methods: A case for west China
    Gao, Rong
    Zhao, Danyue
    Zhang, Ping
    Li, Meng
    Huang, Hongrong
    Zhuo, La
    Wu, Pute
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [6] Carbon footprint and water footprint of rice and wheat production in Punjab, India
    Kashyap, Durba
    Agarwal, Tripti
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 186
  • [7] Changes and driving mechanism of water footprint scarcity in crop production: A study of Jiangsu Province, China
    Cao, Xinchun
    Huang, Xuan
    Huang, He
    Liu, Jing
    Guo, Xiangping
    Wang, Weiguang
    She, Dongli
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 95 : 444 - 454
  • [8] ANALYSIS OF WATER FOOTPRINT OF RICE PRODUCTION IN THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REACHES OF THE YANGTZE RIVER
    Zheng, Chengxin
    Zhang, Zhanyu
    Chen, Wenmeng
    Ren, Hong
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (06): : 6176 - 6187
  • [9] Ecological footprint, water scarcity footprint, and benefit to cost ratio analysis towards sustainable rice production in Thailand
    Jaibumrung, Konkanok
    Nilsalab, Pariyapat
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    Musikavong, Charongpun
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 39 : 79 - 92
  • [10] Water footprint benchmarks for crop production: A first global assessment
    Mekonnen, Mesfin M.
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 : 214 - 223