Evaluation of Software Mediated Process Assessments for IT Service Management

被引:3
|
作者
Shrestha, Anup [1 ]
Cater-Steel, Aileen [1 ]
Toleman, Mark [1 ]
Rout, Terry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Sch Management & Enterprise, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
ITSM process assessment; ISO/IEC; 15504; Evaluation; IT service management; Process improvement; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; ISO/IEC; 15504;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-19860-6_7
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
IT service organisations are cognisant that continual service improvement can be achieved by conducting regular process assessments. However, such assessments are expensive and so we have developed a Decision Support System (DSS) tool which uses the international standard for process assessment ISO/IEC 15504 to offer a transparent and efficient approach. This paper provides evidence of evaluation of this software-mediated process assessment (SMPA) approach which was based on ISO/IEC 15504, ISO/IEC 20000 and the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL (R)). In a usability evaluation of the online tool, participants reported largely positive experiences finding the online survey easy to use trustworthy, comfortable, generally effective, and more transparent and less costly to implement than a manual assessment. However, to engage in process improvement, human judgment, and possibly expert assessment facilitators are necessary for assessment validation and improvement, that is, a fully automated online survey that is strictly standard-based is not very useful. Further clarification of the survey questions with relevant examples, clearer answer options and having more visible goal statements on every question page were suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment method for IT service management
    Shrestha, Anup
    Cater-Steel, Aileen
    Toleman, Mark
    Behari, Suren
    Rajaeian, Mohammad Mehdi
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 57 (04)
  • [2] The Issue of Reliability in Software Mediated Process Assessments
    Shrestha, Anup
    Cater-Steel, Aileen
    Toleman, Mark
    Rout, Terry
    Behari, Suren
    [J]. SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AND CAPABILITY DETERMINATION (SPICE 2016), 2016, 609 : 195 - 209
  • [3] Evaluation Process Management Software for Security Evaluation
    Razzazi, Mohammadreza
    Tahouri, Ali
    Fayazbakhsh, Kaveh
    [J]. 2008 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES: FROM THEORY TO APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1628 - 1631
  • [4] An empirical review of software process assessments
    El Emam, K
    Goldenson, DR
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, VOL 53: EMPHASIZING DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, 2000, 53 : 319 - 423
  • [5] Software Process as a Service: Towards A Software Process Ecosystem
    Greulich, Oliver
    Knieke, Christoph
    Rafie, Bassel
    Rausch, Andreas
    Kuhrmann, Marco
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS PROCESSES, ICSSP 2024, 2024, : 77 - 86
  • [6] Evaluation of a process for architectural assumption management in software development
    Yang, Chen
    Liang, Peng
    Avgeriou, Paris
    [J]. SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2018, 168 : 38 - 70
  • [7] Results from process assessments in software companies
    Strigel, WB
    [J]. INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 581 - 584
  • [8] Software process - Standards, assessments rand improvement
    Finkelstein, A
    Fuggetta, A
    Montangero, C
    Derniame, JC
    [J]. SOFTWARE PROCESS: PRINCIPLES, METHODOLOGY, AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 1500 : 15 - 25
  • [9] Software process evaluation: a machine learning framework with application to defect management process
    Ning Chen
    Steven C. H. Hoi
    Xiaokui Xiao
    [J]. Empirical Software Engineering, 2014, 19 : 1531 - 1564
  • [10] Software process evaluation: a machine learning framework with application to defect management process
    Chen, Ning
    Hoi, Steven C. H.
    Xiao, Xiaokui
    [J]. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (06) : 1531 - 1564