Giant cell tumour of the bone treated with denosumab: How has the blood supply and oncological prognosis of the tumour changed?

被引:18
|
作者
Niu, Xiaohui [1 ]
Yang, Yongkun [1 ]
Wong, Kwok Chuen [2 ]
Huang, Zhen [1 ]
Ding, Yi [3 ]
Zhang, Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Orthoped Oncol Surg, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Blood supply; Denosumab; Giant cell tumour of bone; Prognosis; Surgical treatment; OSTEOPROTEGERIN LIGAND; CONTRAST-ENHANCEMENT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OPEN-LABEL; DIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; CYTOKINE; EFFICACY; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jot.2018.10.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Denosumab is gradually applied to refractory or unresectable giant cell tumour of the bone. Whether denosumab can effectively reduce the blood supply of tumour and bring benefit is worthy of study. The aim of the study is to evaluate the related changes after treatment: blood supply, surgical plan downstaging, surgical difficulty and oncological prognosis. Methods: A self-caseecontrol study was performed from June 2014 to November 2016, and 18 patients were enrolled. Patients received subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg every 4 weeks pre-operatively, with additional doses administered on Days 8 and 15 during the first month of therapy. The initial treatment duration was 12 weeks. After 12 weeks treatment, enhanced CT examination was performed for evaluating whether surgical treatment was practicable. The patients received preoperative denosumab treatment for 5 (median 3, range 3-12) months in average. The microvessel density of tumour samples was calculated for evaluating tumour blood supply. The computed tomography (CT) enhancement rate was compared before and after treatment. The related changes of parameters were recorded as the following: clinical benefits, serious side effects, enhancement rate of CT, surgical plans, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, surgical difficulty, histological changes and local recurrence. The patients were followed up every 3 months postoperatively. Results: The average CT enhancement rate of lesions was 2.08 and 1.40 before and after treatment (p = 0.000), respectively. The unenhanced CT value was significantly increased after treatment (p = 0.038). The CT enhancement rate changed more significantly in pelvic or sacral lesions than that in limb lesions (p = 0.024). Sixteen cases underwent final surgery, and surgical plan was downstaged. The histological examination showed tumour cells were significantly reduced or even disappeared after treatment. The microvessel density decreased significantly after treatment. The mean postoperative follow-up was 18.8 (10-31) months, and five patients had local recurrence. The high local recurrence rate (4/6) in sacral tumours may be related to the increased difficulty of curettage. Conclusion: Denosumab treatment can reduce the blood supply of giant cell tumour. The sacral or pelvic lesions changed more significantly than limb lesions. The surgical plan down-staging can also be achieved. The clear margin after denosumab treatment facilitated tumour resection but, increased difficult in curettage surgery, and high recurrence rate of sacral tumour is being concerned. The Translational Impact of this Article: Denosumab is a new type of humanized monoclonal antibody which showed some effect in the treatment giant cell tumor of bone. Pre-operative treatment with denosamub can reduce intra-operative blood loss and down-stage surgical plan in suitable cases. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd on behalf of Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 108
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Malignant giant cell tumour of bone
    King, ESJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1932, 20 (78) : 269 - 278
  • [42] Multicentric giant cell tumour of bone
    Dhillon, Mandeep S.
    Prasad, Prabhudev
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2007, 73 (03): : 289 - 299
  • [43] Giant cell tumour in the scaphoid bone
    Kew, J
    Kumta, SM
    Leung, PC
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (09) : 717 - 718
  • [44] Giant-cell tumour of bone
    Szendröi, M
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (01): : 5 - 12
  • [45] Giant cell tumour of bone around the knee: a systematic review of the functional and oncological outcomes
    do Brito, Joaquim Soares
    Spranger, Andre
    Almeida, Paulo
    Portela, Jose
    Barrientos-Ruiz, Irene
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (08) : 641 - 650
  • [46] The dilemma of denosumab: Salvage of a femoral head giant cell tumour
    Gaston, Czar Louie
    Puls, Florian
    Grimer, Robert John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2014, 5 (11): : 783 - 786
  • [47] Cell composition in the bone giant cell tumour
    Zakharava, V.
    Mohammadi, M. T.
    Pashkevich, L.
    Shpileuski, I.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 475 : S414 - S415
  • [48] Correction to: Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour
    Shinji Tsukamoto
    Andreas F. Mavrogenis
    Giulio Leone
    Alberto Righi
    Manabu Akahane
    Piergiuseppe Tanzi
    Akira Kido
    Kanya Honoki
    Yasuhito Tanaka
    Davide Maria Donati
    Costantino Errani
    International Orthopaedics, 2019, 43 : 491 - 491
  • [49] Clinical, radiological and pathological outcomes following treatment of primary giant cell tumour of bone with Denosumab
    Murphy, Benjamin
    Vodanovich, Domagoj
    Spelman, Tim
    Gullifer, James
    Slavin, John
    Powell, Gerard
    Pang, Grant
    Choong, Peter
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (12) : 2553 - 2558
  • [50] Denosumab salvage therapy in a patient with a locally advanced and refractory sellar giant cell tumour of bone
    Marques, Pedro
    Appelman-Dijkstra, Natasha M.
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Kruit, Mark C.
    van Furth, Wouter R.
    Pereira, Alberto M.
    Biermasz, Nienke R.
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 8 (04): : 348 - 348