Assessing IT Governance Processes Using a COBIT5 Model

被引:0
|
作者
Cadete, Goncalo Rodrigues [1 ]
da Silva, Miguel Mira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
关键词
COBIT; Enterprise architecture; ArchiMate; Enterprise governance of IT; Business and IT alignment; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS RESEARCH; DESIGN SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_36
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
COBIT5 process assessments are conducted to support process improvement and thus enable business-IT alignment. For providing an assessment, assessors engage in planning, data collection, and data validation activities. Typically, these activities are assisted by spreadsheet-like artifacts, that are used for recording the COBIT5 Process Assessment Model (PAM) entities, as well as the corresponding assessment evidence. However, spreadsheet-like artifacts are not an optimal solution for assisting assessment activities, since they do not form part of an integrated and up-to-date enterprise architecture (EA) repository. Contradicting the COBIT5 recommendation of using EA namely for improving alignment, increase agility, and generate potential cost savings - COBIT5 assessors often do not practice what they preach, i.e. that they do not use EA in their own business activities. Some EA tool vendors provide solutions for addressing this gap, but they are proprietary and lack scientific validation, thus presenting interoperability and adoption barriers. In this paper, we propose a set of COBIT5 viewpoints, based on standard ArchiMate extensions to enable interoperability and ease adoption. We designed and tested the solution using a Design Science Research Methodology process model. We demonstrated the EA proposal in two public sector organizations, and evaluated its efficacy, consistency, and structural quality.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 460
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Scrum for Implementing IT Governance with COBIT 5
    Amorim, Ana Claudia
    da Silva, Miguel Mira
    Pereira, Ruben
    Goncalves, Margarida
    2018 IEEE 22ND INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDOC 2018), 2018, : 198 - 207
  • [2] Using the Cobit 5 for E-health Governance
    Kozina, Melita
    Sekovanic, Ines
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2015, 2015, : 203 - 209
  • [3] A Model for Assessing COBIT 5 and ISO 27001 Simultaneously
    Almeida, Rafael
    Lourinho, Renato
    da Silva, Miguel Mira
    Pereira, Ruben
    2018 20TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS (IEEE CBI 2018), VOL 1, 2018, : 60 - 69
  • [4] E-Business IT Governance Revisited: An Attempt towards Outlining a Novel Bi-directional Business/IT Alignment in COBIT5
    Bartens, Yannick
    Schulte, Frederik
    Voss, Stefan
    2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 4356 - 4365
  • [5] The Impact of Using Information Technology Governance COBIT5 in Reducing Banking Credit Risk in Islamic Banks - Case Study of Islamic International Arab Bank
    Al-Hakim, Munir S.
    Khrais, Ibrahim
    Alsadi, Khaled
    Khasawneh, Yehya
    2021 22ND INTERNATIONAL ARAB CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ACIT), 2021, : 445 - 456
  • [6] Assessment of IT Governance of Bakti Internet Access Program Based on the COBIT5 Framework Case Study: Balai Latihan Kerja Kendari
    Muhammad, Raditya
    Edward, Ian Yosef Matheus
    2018 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, SERVICES, AND APPLICATIONS (TSSA), 2018,
  • [7] 信息技术内部控制研究——基于COBIT5的分析
    林斌
    曹健
    舒伟
    江西财经大学学报, 2016, (01) : 36 - 44
  • [8] Information system governance using the cobit 5 At sari mulia hospital
    Mambang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND SARI MULIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SCIENCES 2017 (SMICHS 2017), 2017, 6 : 422 - 430
  • [9] 基于COBIT5的信息治理和管理体系建立实践
    伍明
    科技创新与应用, 2014, (32) : 272 - 272
  • [10] COBIT5 An Approach to Analysing an Organization's Knowledge and Knowledge Management During due Diligence
    Delak, Bostjan
    Damiji, Nadja
    Majweski, Grzegorz Marek
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2014), VOLS 1-3, 2014, : 242 - 249