Laparoscopy for the Detection and Treatment of Early Complications from Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Wszolek, Matthew F. [1 ]
Canes, David [1 ]
Moinzadeh, Alireza [1 ]
Sorcini, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Lahey Clin Med Ctr, Inst Urol, Burlington, MA 01805 USA
关键词
CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; RELAPAROSCOPY; EXPLORATION; HEMORRHAGE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1089/end.2012.0165
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the role of laparoscopy for the detection and management of early postoperative complications after minimally invasive urologic surgery. Patients and Methods: From October 2003 to September 2008, data were prospectively collected for all patients needing surgical intervention within 21 days after urologic minimally invasive procedures. No patients operated on for a postoperative complication during this period were excluded. Minimally invasive surgical intervention was performed on all hemodynamically stable patients in whom pneumoperitoneum could be established safely. Results: A total of 1962 laparoscopic or robot-assisted urologic procedures were performed. In 14 (0.7%) cases, surgical intervention was necessary for postoperative complications. Two patients underwent exploratory laparotomy because of abdominal distention and hemodynamic instability. Laparoscopic surgical intervention successfully diagnosed and treated the remaining 12 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. No additional trocars were necessary apart from preexisting sites. Two (14%) patients had minor postexploration complications. Mean estimated blood loss was 70mL (range 50-100mL). The mean length of hospital stay after exploration was 2 days (range 5 hours-5 days). Conclusions: With surgical expertise, laparoscopic treatment of intra-abdominal complications after minimally invasive urologic procedures can be successfully and safely performed. The advantages of the minimally invasive approach may be preserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1201
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OCULAR COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING MINIMALLY INVASIVE UROLOGIC SURGERY
    Koning, J. L.
    Nicolay, L.
    Heldt, J. P.
    Millard, W.
    Jellison, F.
    Ebrahimi, K.
    Dunbar, J.
    Baldwin, D. D.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 57 (01) : 142 - 142
  • [2] History, advantages, complications, and limits of minimally invasive urologic pelvic surgery
    Mearini, Ettore
    Schips, Luigi
    Sebe, Philippe
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [3] The role of urologic laparoscopy in the management of complications from gynecologic surgery
    Miller, Scott D.
    Voeltz, Zachary L.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A240 - A240
  • [4] Laparoscopy, minimally invasive surgery, and percutaneous treatment of hepatic tumors
    Adamsen, S
    ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (11) : 884 - 889
  • [5] RELAPAROSCOPY FOR THE DETECTION AND TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC UROLOGIC SURGERY
    Wszolek, Matthew F.
    Sorcini, Andrea
    Moinzadeh, Aleriza
    Tuerk, Ingolf A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 277 - 278
  • [6] Complications of hand-assisted laparoscopy in urologic surgery
    Hedican, SP
    Wolf, JS
    Moon, TD
    Rayhill, SC
    Seifman, BD
    Nakada, SY
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 22 - 23
  • [7] Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children
    Danielle D Sweeney
    Marc C Smaldone
    Steven G Docimo
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2007, 4 : 26 - 38
  • [8] Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children
    Sweeney, Danielle D.
    Smaldone, Marc C.
    Docimo, Steven G.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (01): : 26 - 38
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Pediatric Urologic Surgery Preface
    Shukla, Aseem R.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 42 (01) : XV - XV
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Pediatric Urologic Surgery Foreword
    Taneja, Samir S.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 42 (01) : XIII - XIII