Neural activity modulations and motor recovery following brain-exoskeleton interface mediated stroke rehabilitation

被引:27
|
作者
Bhagat, Nikunj A. [1 ,6 ]
Yozbatiran, Nuray [2 ]
Sullivan, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Paranjape, Ruta [2 ]
Losey, Colin [3 ]
Hernandez, Zachary [1 ]
Keser, Zafer [2 ]
Grossman, Robert [4 ]
Francisco, Gerard E. [2 ]
O'Malley, Marcia K. [2 ,3 ]
Contreras-Vidal, Jose L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Noninvas Brain Machine Interface Syst Lab, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, TIRR Mem Hermann, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, McGovern Med Sch,NeuroRecovery Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Rice Univ, Mechatron & Hapt Interfaces Lab, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[4] Houston Methodist Res Inst, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Houston, NSF IUCRC BRAIN, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[6] Northwell Hlth, Feinstein Inst Med Res, New York, NY 11030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Brain-machine interface; Stroke rehabilitation; Exoskeletons; Clinical trial; Movement related cortical potentials; UPPER-LIMB; UPPER EXTREMITY; STIMULATION; IMPAIRMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102502
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) based on scalp EEG have the potential to promote cortical plasticity following stroke, which has been shown to improve motor recovery outcomes. However, the efficacy of BMI enabled robotic training for upper-limb recovery is seldom quantified using clinical, EEG-based, and kinematics-based metrics. Further, a movement related neural correlate that can predict the extent of motor recovery still remains elusive, which impedes the clinical translation of BMI-based stroke rehabilitation. To address above knowledge gaps, 10 chronic stroke individuals with stable baseline clinical scores were recruited to participate in 12 therapy sessions involving a BMI enabled powered exoskeleton for elbow training. On average, 132 +/- 22 repetitions were performed per participant, per session. BMI accuracy across all sessions and subjects was 79 +/- 18% with a false positives rate of 23 +/- 20%. Post-training clinical assessments found that FMA for upper extremity and ARAT scores significantly improved over baseline by 3.92 +/- 3.73 and 5.35 +/- 4.62 points, respectively. Also, 80% participants (7 with moderate-mild impairment, 1 with severe impairment) achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID: FMA-UE >5.2 or ARAT >5.7) during the course of the study. Kinematic measures indicate that, on average, participants' movements became faster and smoother. Moreover, modulations in movement related cortical potentials, an EEG-based neural correlate measured contralateral to the impaired arm, were significantly correlated with ARAT scores (rho = 0.72, p < 0.05) and marginally correlated with FMA-UE (rho = 0.63, p = 0.051). This suggests higher activation of ipsi-lesional hemisphere post-intervention or inhibition of competing contra-lesional hemisphere, which may be evidence of neuroplasticity and cortical reorganization following BMI mediated rehabilitation therapy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients with a Bioengineered “Brain–Computer Interface with Exoskeleton” System
    Kotov S.V.
    Turbina L.G.
    Bobrov P.D.
    Frolov A.A.
    Pavlova O.G.
    Kurganskaya M.E.
    Biryukova E.V.
    Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 2016, 46 (5) : 518 - 522
  • [2] Contralesional Brain-Computer Interface Control of a Powered Exoskeleton for Motor Recovery in Chronic Stroke Survivors
    Bundy, David T.
    Souders, Lauren
    Baranyai, Kelly
    Leonard, Laura
    Schalk, Gerwin
    Coker, Robert
    Moran, Daniel W.
    Huskey, Thy
    Leuthardt, Eric C.
    STROKE, 2017, 48 (07) : 1908 - +
  • [3] Reorganization of Bioelectrical Activity in the Neocortex after Stroke by Rehabilitation Using a Brain–Computer Interface Controlling a Wrist Exoskeleton
    Kotov S.V.
    Romanova M.V.
    Kondur A.A.
    Biryukova E.V.
    Frolov A.A.
    Turbina L.G.
    Isakova E.V.
    Zaitseva E.V.
    Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 2020, 50 (9) : 1146 - 1154
  • [4] Applications of Brain–Machine Interface Systems in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
    Venkatakrishnan A.
    Francisco G.E.
    L. Contreras-Vidal J.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2014, 2 (2) : 93 - 105
  • [5] Brain-Computer Interface-Driven Functional Electrical Stimulation for Motor Rehabilitation following Stroke
    Krueger, Johanna
    Reichert, Christoph
    Duerschmid, Stefan
    Krauth, Richard
    Vogt, Susanne
    Huchtemann, Tessa
    Lindquist, Sabine
    Lamprecht, Juliane
    Sailer, Michael
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Hinrichs, Hermann
    Sweeney-Reed, Catherine M.
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2020, 51 (03) : 144 - 155
  • [6] PRINCIPLES OF MOTOR RECOVERY IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS USING HAND EXOSKELETON CONTROLLED BY THE BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE BASED ON MOTOR IMAGERY
    Frolov, A. A.
    Husek, D.
    Biryukova, E. V.
    Bobrov, P. D.
    Mokienko, O. A.
    Alexandrov, A. V.
    NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2017, 27 (01) : 107 - 137
  • [7] A Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stroke Rehabilitation
    Ortner, R.
    Irimia, D. -C.
    Scharinger, J.
    Guger, C.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CYBERTHERAPY AND TELEMEDICINE, 2012, 10 : 319 - 323
  • [8] Motor Imagery Hand Movement Direction Decoding Using Brain Computer Interface to Aid Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
    Benzy, V. K.
    Vinod, A. P.
    Subasree, R.
    Alladi, Suvarna
    Raghavendra, K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2020, 28 (12) : 3051 - 3062
  • [9] A Hybrid Brain-Machine Interface based on EEG and EMG activity for the Motor Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
    Sarasola-Sanz, Andrea
    Irastorza-Landa, Nerea
    Lopez-Larraz, Eduardo
    Bibian, Carlos
    Helmhold, Florian
    Broetz, Doris
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS (ICORR), 2017, : 895 - 900
  • [10] Use of a Brain–Computer Interface + Exoskeleton Technology in Complex Multimodal Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
    Kotov S.V.
    Isakova E.V.
    Slyun’kova E.V.
    Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 2020, 50 (8) : 987 - 991