Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic performance of RC bridge piers considering buckling and low-cycle fatigue of high-strength steel bars

被引:48
|
作者
Ding, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Dianqi [2 ]
Su, Junsheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhong-Xian [1 ,2 ]
Zong, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Keyan [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Coast Civil Struct Safety, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Municapal Engn Design & Res Inst, Tianjin 300392, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
High-strength steel bars (HSSB); RC bridge piers; Seismic performance; Bar buckling; Low-cycle fatigue; CONCRETE FLEXURAL MEMBERS; SPECIAL MOMENT FRAMES; REINFORCEMENT; BEHAVIOR; COLUMNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111464
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to promote the application of high-strength steel bars (HSSB) in reinforced concrete (RC) bridge structures, the mechanical properties of HSSB as well as seismic performance of high-strength RC piers were investigated by experimental study and numerical analysis. First, monotonic and low cycle fatigue tests of HRB400E and HTRB600 steel with different slenderness ratios (L/D) were conducted to comparatively study their mechanical properties. Then, quasi-static cyclic tests of seven rectangular RC piers were conducted to study the effects of concrete cover, longitudinal reinforcement yield strength, concrete strength and axial load ratio on seismic behavior of RC piers. Finally, a fiber-based beam-column element was used to simulate the mechanical behavior of steel material and nonlinear response of RC piers. Material tests indicate that HTRB600 steel has lower uniform and fracture elongations, as well as inferior low-cycle fatigue performance than HRB400E steel. Increase of the slenderness ratio (L/D) severely weakens low-cycle fatigue life of steel bars, and the low-cycle fatigue parameters of steel can be fitted for each slenderness ratio, respectively. Even though HTRB600 steel has relatively lower ductility and inferior low-cycle fatigue performance, the RC piers with HTRB600 steel still have higher or at least comparable deformation capacity than that with HRB400E steel. This results from the reduction of strain demands of longitudinal bars by the utilization of HSSB in RC piers. Removing the concrete cover neighboring the longitudinal bars in the plastic hinge region has trivial impact on bar buckling and ultimate displacement of RC piers, which confirms that the concrete cover has already spalled off prior to the initiation of longitudinal reinforcement buckling. With identical steel strength and tie configuration, the ultimate displacement of RC pier with C80 concrete is significantly lower than that with C40 and C60 concrete, while the latter two have similar deformation capacity. Increase of axial load ratio (from 0.06 to 0.18) obviously reduces ultimate displacement of RC piers, since the concrete in the compression zone endures greater compressive stress under higher axial load and thus compressive failure occurs earlier. The ReinforcingSteel material model in OpenSees is calibrated by experimental data to accurately simulate the buckling and low-cycle fatigue properties of HRB400E and HTRB600 steel. The fiber-based finite element model (FEM) can predict the strain development of longitudinal bars of RC piers under cyclic loading, and the resulting low-cycle fatigue damage of steel material as well as strength degradation of RC piers. Combined with experimental study and FEM, this paper reveals the influence mechanisms of different factors on the seismic performance of RC piers in detail.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel reinforcing bars considering the effect of inelastic buckling
    Aldabagh, Saif
    Alam, M. Shahria
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 235
  • [2] Experimental investigation into corrosion effect on buckling and low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel bars
    Wu, Dianqi
    Ding, Yang
    Su, Junsheng
    Li, Zhong-Xian
    Zhao, Bo
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 312
  • [3] Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance of High-Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars
    Ghannoum, Wassim M.
    Slavin, Chase M.
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2016, 113 (06) : 803 - 814
  • [4] Investigation on low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel bars including the effect of inelastic buckling
    Wu, Dianqi
    Ding, Yang
    Su, Junsheng
    Li, Zhong-Xian
    Zong, Liang
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 272
  • [5] Low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel rebars in concrete bridge columns
    Aldabagh, Saif
    Rodriguez, Jhordy
    Alam, M. Shahria
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2022, 51 (05): : 1115 - 1132
  • [6] Comparative study on seismic vulnerability of RC bridge piers reinforced with normal and high-strength steel bars
    Su, Junsheng
    Li, Zhong-Xian
    Dhakal, Rajesh Prasad
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Fangbo
    STRUCTURES, 2021, 29 : 1562 - 1581
  • [7] Quasi-static tests and seismic fragility analysis of RC bridge piers with high-strength steel bars and high-strength/ultra-high performance concrete
    Wu, Dianqi
    Ding, Yang
    Su, Junsheng
    Li, Zhong-Xian
    Liu, Zhengnan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 297
  • [8] Influence of ground motion duration on seismic behavior of RC bridge piers: The role of low-cycle fatigue damage of reinforcing bars
    Su, Junsheng
    Wu, Dianqi
    Wang, Xiaowei
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 279
  • [9] Seismic Performance of High-Strength Steel RC Bridge Columns
    Barbosa, Andre R.
    Link, Tim
    Trejo, David
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (02)
  • [10] On the relevance of incorporating bar slip, bar buckling and low-cycle fatigue effects in seismic fragility assessment of RC bridge piers
    Bouazza, H.
    Djelil, M.
    Matallah, M.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 256