Does Zero Tillage Improve the Livelihoods of Smallholder Cropping Farmers?

被引:38
|
作者
El-Shater, Tamer [1 ]
Yigezu, Yigezu A. [1 ]
Mugera, Amin [2 ]
Piggin, Colin [1 ]
Haddad, Atef [1 ]
Khalil, Yaseen [1 ]
Loss, Stephen [1 ]
Aw-Hassan, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Western Australia, Inst Agr, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Consumption; cropping farms; endogenous switching regression; farm income; livelihoods; propensity score matching; small holders; Syria; zero tillage; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; ECONOMETRIC EVALUATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; ADOPTION; VARIETIES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/1477-9552.12133
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The biophysical benefits of zero tillage (ZT) are well documented in the literature. However, the literature on its economic benefits, especially in the context of small and medium-scale farmers in the temperate developing world is scanty. Using a study of 621 wheat farmers in Syria, we provide empirical evidence on the impacts of adoption of ZT on farm income and wheat consumption. We use propensity score matching (PSM) and endogenous switching regression (ESR) approaches to account for potential selection biases. After controlling for confounding factors, we find that adoption of the ZT technology leads to a US$ 189/ha (33%) increase in net crop income and a 26kg (34%) gain in per capita wheat consumption per year (adult equivalent) - an indication of meaningful changes in the livelihoods of the farm households. Besides the biophysical and environmental benefits documented elsewhere, our results suggest that adoption of ZT can also be justified on economic and food security grounds. Therefore, ZT can have sizeable impacts in transforming the agricultural sector in the temperate developing world provided that the technology is well promoted and adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 172
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does minimum tillage improve the livelihood outcomes of smallholder farmers in Zambia?
    Ngoma, Hambulo
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2018, 10 (02) : 381 - 396
  • [2] Does minimum tillage improve the livelihood outcomes of smallholder farmers in Zambia?
    Hambulo Ngoma
    [J]. Food Security, 2018, 10 : 381 - 396
  • [3] Diversifying conservation agriculture and conventional tillage cropping systems to improve the wellbeing of smallholder farmers in Malawi
    TerAvest, Dan
    Wandschneider, Philip R.
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Reganold, John P.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 171 : 23 - 35
  • [4] Does Minimum Tillage Improve Smallholder Farmers' Welfare? Evidence from Southern Tanzania
    Osewe, Maurice
    Miyinzi Mwungu, Chris
    Liu, Aijun
    [J]. LAND, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 12
  • [5] Forages improve livelihoods of smallholder farmers with beef cattle in South Central Coastal Vietnam
    Nguyen Xuan Ba
    Lane, Peter A.
    Parsons, David
    Nguyen Huu Van
    Ho Le Phi Khanh
    Corfield, Jeff P.
    Duong Tri Tuan
    [J]. TROPICAL GRASSLANDS-FORRAJES TROPICALES, 2013, 1 (02): : 225 - 229
  • [6] Improved water management practices improve cropping system profitability and smallholder farmers' incomes
    Dutta, S. K.
    Laing, Alison M.
    Kumar, S.
    Gathala, Mahesh K.
    Singh, Ajoy K.
    Gaydon, D. S.
    Poulton, P.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 242
  • [7] NO-TILL CROPPING SYSTEMS FOR SMALLHOLDER FARMERS
    OGBORN, J
    [J]. APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY, 1982, 9 (02) : 7 - 9
  • [8] Conservation Agriculture and Livelihoods of Smallholder Farmers in Central Mozambique
    Nkala, Peter
    Mango, Nelson
    Zikhali, Precious
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2011, 35 (07): : 757 - 779
  • [9] Conservation Agriculture and Livelihoods of Smallholder Farmers in Central Mozambique
    Birru, Worku Tuffa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2012, 18 (02): : 191 - 193
  • [10] Together again - Kenyans and Canadians work together to improve sustainable livelihoods of Kenyan smallholder dairy farmers
    Dudych, Alanna
    Lawson, Kaitlyn
    Oliver, Vanessa
    Perrault, Elyse
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2022, 63 (11): : 1106 - 1108