Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer

被引:16
|
作者
Shafiei, Fereshteh [1 ]
Tavangar, Maryam Sadat [1 ,2 ]
Ghahramani, Yasamin [3 ]
Fattah, Zahra [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Shiraz 713451836, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Biomat Res Ctr, Shiraz 713451836, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Shiraz 713451836, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | 2014年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
Endodontically treated premolar; Intracoronal direct restoration; Silorane-based composite; Polyethylene fiber; Nano-ionomer; Fracture resistance; ROOT-FILLED TEETH; CUSPAL DEFLECTION; IN-VITRO; RESTORATION TECHNIQUES; RESIN COMPOSITE; BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; MARGINAL ADAPTATION; MANDIBULAR MOLARS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; INSERTION;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.200
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. This in vitro study investigated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored using silorane- or methacrylate-based composite along with or without fiber or nano-ionomer base. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ninety-six intact maxillary premolars were randomly divided into eight groups (n = 12). G1 (negative control) was the intact teeth. In Groups 2-8, root canal treatment with mesio-occlusodistal preparation was performed. G2 (positive control) was kept unrestored. The other groups were restored using composite resin as follows: G3, methacrylate-based composite (Z250); G4, methacrylate composite (Z250) with polyethylene fiber; G5 and G6, silorane based composite (Filtek P90) without and with the fiber, respectively; G7 and G8, methacrylate- and silorane-based composite with nano-ionomer base, respectively. After aging period and thermocycling for 1000 cycles, fracture strength was tested and fracture patterns were inspected. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (alpha=0.05). RESULTS. Mean fracture resistance for the eight groups (in Newton) were G1: 1200 +/- 169(a), G2: 360 +/- 93(b), G3: 632 +/- 196(c), G4: 692 +/- 195(c), G5: 917 +/- 159(d), G6: 1013 +/- 125(ad), G7: 959 +/- 148(d), G8: 947 +/- 105(d) (different superscript letters revealed significant difference among groups). Most of the fractures in all the groups were restorable, except Group 3. CONCLUSION. Silorane-based composite revealed significantly higher strength of the restored premolars compared to that of methacrylate one. Fiber insertion demonstrated no additional effect on the strength of both composite restorations; however, it increased the prevalence of restorable fracture of methacrylate-based composite restored teeth. Using nano-ionomer base under methacrylate-based composite had a positive effect on fracture resistance and pattern. Only fiber-reinforced silorane composite restoration resulted in a strength similar to that of the intact teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 206
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods
    Mergulhao, V. A.
    de Mendonca, L. S.
    de Albuquerque, M. S.
    Braz, R.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 44 (01) : E1 - E11
  • [2] RESISTANCE TO FRACTURE OF RESTORED ENDODONTICALLY TREATED PREMOLARS
    TROPE, M
    MALTZ, O
    LANGER, I
    TRONSTAD, L
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1985, 11 (03) : 143 - 143
  • [3] Effect of Fiber Post and Cusp Coverage on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Directly Restored with Composite Resin
    Mohammadi, Narmin
    Kahnamoii, Mehdi Abed
    Yeganeh, Parnian Karimi
    Navimipour, Elmira Jafari
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (10) : 1428 - 1432
  • [4] RESISTANCE TO FRACTURE OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED PREMOLARS RESTORED WITH GLASS IONOMER CEMENT OR ACID ETCH COMPOSITE RESIN
    TROPE, M
    TRONSTAD, L
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1991, 17 (06) : 257 - 259
  • [5] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated Premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite
    Hürmüzlü, F
    Kiremitçi, A
    Serper, A
    Altundasar, E
    Siso, SH
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (12) : 838 - 840
  • [6] The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars
    Shahrbaf, S.
    Mirzakouchaki, B.
    Oskoui, S. S.
    Kahnarnoui, M. A.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 32 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [7] Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays
    Hannig, C
    Westphal, C
    Becker, K
    Attin, T
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 94 (04): : 342 - 349
  • [8] The effect of fiber post location on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars
    Sulaiman, Eshamsul
    Alarami, Nada
    Wong, Yuh Ing
    Lee, Wen Hui
    Al-Haddad, Afaf
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2018, 55 (03) : 275 - 279
  • [9] Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored
    Ausiello, P
    De Gee, AJ
    Rengo, S
    Davidson, CL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 10 (05): : 237 - 241
  • [10] Fracture Resistance of Premolar Teeth Restored with Silorane-Based or Dimethacrylate-Based Composite Resins
    Akbarian, Golsa
    Ameri, Hamideh
    Chasteen, Joseph E.
    Ghavamnasiri, Marjaneh
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 26 (03) : 200 - 207