Cumulative Live-Birth Rates After In Vitro Fertilization

被引:0
|
作者
Malizia, Beth A. [1 ]
Hacker, Michele R.
Penzias, Alan S.
机构
[1] Boston IVF, Waltham, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ogx.0000350975.79567.a2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
When a couple requires in vitro fertilization (IVF), their main concern is whether this treatment will result in a live birth, not statistics on outcomes per IVF cycle according to maternal age. The cumulative live-birth rate provides a better and more meaningful estimate of a successful pregnancy. Prior studies estimating the cumulative live-birth rate had many deficiencies, including inconsistent inclusion criteria and outcomes, small sample size, and failure to report maternal age or multiple births. This retrospective cohort study estimated cumulative live-birth rates among 6164 patients undergoing their first fresh-embryo, nondonor IVF cycle at a fertility center between 2000 and 2005. Treated patients were followed for at least I year until either discontinuation of treatment or a live delivery. Data were analyzed for 2 primary maternal age groups stratified at the start of cycle 1: (a) younger than 35 years, and (b) 40 years or older. Analyses were performed using both optimistic and conservative methods to estimate the cumulative live-birth rate. With the optimistic method, calculation of the cumulative live-birth rate is based on the assumption that patients who did not return for subsequent IVF cycles had the same chance of a live-birth pregnancy as those who remained in treatment. The conservative method calculates the cumulative live-birth rate with the assumption of no live births in patients who did not return for subsequent IVF cycles. Among the 6164 women undergoing up to 6 cycles of IVF, the cumulative live-birth rate was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-74%) with the optimistic method, and 51% (95% CI, 49%-52%) with the conservative method. For patients younger than 35 years of age, the optimistic estimate of cumulative live-birth rate after 6 IVF cycles was 86% (95% CI, 83%-88%), and the conservative estimate was 65% (95% CI, 64%-67%). Corresponding rates in patients 40 years of age or older were 42% and 23% (P < 0.001). Among patients 35 years of age or younger and those 40 years or older, both optimistic and conservative cumulative live-birth rates decreased with increasing age. The difference in birth rates between these 2 age-stratified groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). These data suggest that IVF treatment may overcome infertility in younger women but not in older women. The investigators believe that its apparent inability to completely reverse the age-dependent decrease in fertility should be conveyed to women over 40.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 316
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cumulative Live-Birth Rates after In Vitro Fertilization
    Malizia, Beth A.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    Penzias, Alan S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (03): : 236 - 243
  • [2] Cumulative Live-Birth Rates by Maternal Age after One or Multiple In Vitro Fertilization Cycles: An Institutional Experience
    Khalife, Dalia
    Nassar, Anwar
    Khalil, Ali
    Awwad, Johnny
    Abu Musa, Antoine
    Hannoun, Antoine
    El Taha, Lina
    Khalifeh, Fatin
    Abiad, May
    Ghazeeri, Ghina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2020, 14 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [3] Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology
    Moragianni, Vasiliki A.
    Penzias, Alan S.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 22 (03) : 189 - 192
  • [4] Cumulative live birth rates in in-vitro fertilization
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Errazuriz, Joaquin
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Tournaye, Herman
    Vaiarelli, Alberto
    Pluchino, Nicola
    Blockeel, Christophe
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    [J]. MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2019, 71 (03): : 207 - 210
  • [5] Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization
    Schieve, LA
    Peterson, HB
    Meikle, SF
    Jeng, G
    Danel, I
    Burnett, NM
    Wilcox, LS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (19): : 1832 - 1838
  • [6] Prognostic factors of live-birth after in vitro fertilization for unexplained infertility: A cohort study
    Bosselut, H.
    Paulmyer-Lacroix, O.
    Gnisci, A.
    Bretelle, F.
    Perrin, J.
    Courbiere, B.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (7-8): : 601 - 607
  • [7] Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization
    Moore, DE
    Soules, MR
    Klein, NA
    Fujimoto, VY
    Agnew, KJ
    Eschenbach, DA
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (06) : 1118 - 1124
  • [8] CUMULATIVE LIVE-BIRTH RATE WITH REPEAT IN VITRO FERTILIZATION TREATMENT CYCLES OF CHINESE ADVANCED AGE WOMEN.
    Gu, F.
    Ruan, S.
    Xu, Y.
    Zhou, C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E343 - E343
  • [9] CUMULATIVE CONCEPTION AND LIVE-BIRTH RATES AFTER IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION WITH AND WITHOUT THE USE OF LONG, SHORT, AND ULTRASHORT REGIMENS OF THE GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST BUSERELIN
    TAN, SL
    MACONOCHIE, N
    DOYLE, P
    CAMPBELL, S
    BALEN, A
    BEKIR, J
    BRINSDEN, P
    EDWARDS, RG
    JACOBS, HS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (02) : 513 - 520
  • [10] Live-Birth Rate Associated With Repeat In Vitro Fertilization Treatment Cycles
    Smith, Andrew D. A. C.
    Tilling, Kate
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (24): : 2654 - 2662