Mean reversion in international markets: evidence from GARCH and half-life volatility models

被引:12
|
作者
Ahmed, Rizwan Raheem [1 ]
Vveinhardt, Jolita [2 ]
Streimikiene, Dalia [2 ]
Channar, Zahid Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Indus Univ, Fac Management Sci, Gulshan, Pakistan
[2] Lithuanian Sports Univ, Inst Sport Sci & Innovat, Kaunas, Lithuania
[3] Sindh Madressa Tul Islam Univ, Dept Business Adm, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Mean reversion; developed & emerging stock markets; half-life model; ARCH-LM; GARCH (1,1); STOCK MARKETS; VARIANCE; MOMENTUM;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456358
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The objective of this research is to examine and compare the mean reversion phenomenon in developed and emerging stock markets. An important aim is to measure and compare the speed of mean reversion and half-life of volatility shocks of emerging and developed markets. For this purpose, we have selected five developed and seven emerging markets, and used daily market indices for the period of 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2016. We employed autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity - Lagrange multiplier (A.R.C.H.-L.M.), generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (G.A.R.C.H.) (1, 1), and half-life volatility shock techniques to carry out this research. The results of the study confirmed the mean-reverting process in developed and emerging markets. The South Korean market has the slowest mean reversion, and thus has the highest comparative volatility over a longer period of time. However, the Pakistan stock exchange exhibited the fastest mean reverting process. It is also concluded that the relative volatilities are higher in emerging markets, whereas the comparative volatilities are higher in developed markets. Therefore, it is further concluded that the mean reversion process is much faster in emerging indices except the South Korean and Chinese markets. The study recommends that if investors want higher returns in a shorter period of time then they should invest in emerging markets.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1217
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mean-reversion in closed-end fund discount: evidence from half-life
    Ji, Philip Inyeob
    Kim, Sangbae
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (32) : 4503 - 4515
  • [2] Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence from smooth transition GARCH models
    Ben Cheikh, Nidhaleddine
    Ben Zaied, Younes
    Chevallier, Julien
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [3] Forecasting stock index volatility with GARCH models: international evidence
    Sharma, Prateek
    Vipul
    [J]. STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2015, 32 (04) : 445 - +
  • [4] Mean Reversion in International Equity Markets
    Eren, Omer
    Karahan, Cenk C.
    [J]. EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 2020, 20 (04) : 333 - 355
  • [5] The stochastic volatility in mean model: Empirical evidence from international stock markets
    Koopman, SJ
    Uspensky, EH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2002, 17 (06) : 667 - 689
  • [6] Geopolitical Risks, Returns, and Volatility in the MENA Financial Markets: Evidence from GARCH and EGARCH Models
    Gharaibeh, Omar
    Kharabsheh, Buthiena
    [J]. MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2023, 19 (03) : 21 - 36
  • [7] A note on financial vulnerability and volatility in emerging stock markets: evidence from GARCH-MIDAS models
    Demirer, Riza
    Gupta, Rangan
    Li, He
    You, Yu
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [8] Volatility spillover from the US to international stock markets: A heterogeneous volatility spillover GARCH model
    Wang, Yudong
    Pan, Zhiyuan
    Wu, Chongfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2018, 37 (03) : 385 - 400
  • [9] Modeling Volatility Using GARCH Models: Evidence from Vietnam
    Tran Manh Tuyen
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2011, 31 (03): : 1935 - 1942
  • [10] STOCK RETURNS, VOLATILITY AND MEAN REVERSION IN EMERGING AND DEVELOPED FINANCIAL MARKETS
    Ahmed, Rizwan Raheem
    Vveinhardt, Jolita
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Ghauri, Saghir Pervaiz
    Ashraf, Muhammad
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2018, 24 (03) : 1149 - 1177