Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naive or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review

被引:26
|
作者
Ebbers, Hans C. [1 ]
Pieper, Burkhard [1 ]
Issa, Amine [1 ]
Addison, Janet [2 ]
Freudensprung, Ulrich [1 ]
Rezk, Mourad F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Biogen Int GmbH, Baar, Switzerland
[2] Biogen Idec UK, Maidenhead, Berks, England
关键词
Benepali; Biosimilar; ETN; Nocebo; Persistence; Real-world evidence; SB4; Switch; Systematic review; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS PATIENTS; DRUG SURVIVAL; ORIGINATOR; EXPERIENCE; BENEPALI; EFFICACY; SAFETY; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In 2016, SB4 (Benepali (R)) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice. Methods A systematic search for publications on real-world evidence of SB4 effectiveness, safety and drug survival was undertaken using search terms (SB4 OR Benepali OR biosimilar etanercept OR innovator etanercept) in the BIOSIS (R) Toxicology, BIOSIS Previews (R), Embase (R) and MEDLINE (R) databases up to 17 January 2019. Results Of 959 articles identified, eight journal articles, two journal letters and 23 congress abstracts were selected on criteria of original real-world evidence with a clinical focus. As expected with real-world evidence, quality scoring showed that the evidence had high external validity but lower internal validity. A total of 13,552 patients were described across nine European countries and all approved SB4 indications: 2499 were ETN-naive and 11,053 switched from reference ETN to SB4 (switchers). Switch acceptance rates (a combination of clinicians offering and patients accepting initiation on SB4) ranged between 51.6% and 99.0%; patient support programmes positively contributed to acceptance. Disease activity was generally similar pre- and post-switch (typically 3-month timeframe). Retention rates across studies were at least 75% (up to 12 months follow-up). No new safety signals were identified. Differences in discontinuation rates versus historic controls reported in some studies may have been influenced by differences in treatment practices, lack of clinician confidence and nocebo effects. Conclusion Nearly 2500 ETN-naive patients have been initiated on SB4 and outcomes are similar to those patients receiving reference ETN. Overall this systematic review of real-world evidence provides additional reassurance that SB4 is as effective and safe as reference ETN in both switched and naive patients. Funding Biogen International GmbH.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 338
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
    Hans C. Ebbers
    Burkhard Pieper
    Amine Issa
    Janet Addison
    Ulrich Freudensprung
    Mourad F. Rezk
    [J]. Rheumatology and Therapy, 2019, 6 : 317 - 338
  • [2] SWITCHING FROM BIO-ORIGINAL ETANERCEPT TO BIOSIMILAR ETANERCEPT SB4: PATIENT ACCEPTABILITY AND OUTCOMES IN THE REAL WORLD
    Holroyd, C.
    Wallis, D.
    Bennett, S.
    Clayton, P.
    Edwards, C. J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 1180 - 1180
  • [3] Clinical experience with the etanercept biosimilar SB4 in psoriatic patients
    Pescitelli, L.
    Lazzeri, L.
    Di Cesare, A.
    Tripo, L.
    Ricceri, F.
    Prignano, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 41 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [4] Clinical experience with the etanercept biosimilar SB4 in psoriatic patients
    L. Pescitelli
    L. Lazzeri
    A. Di Cesare
    L. Tripo
    F. Ricceri
    F. Prignano
    [J]. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2019, 41 : 9 - 12
  • [5] LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SB4 (ETANERCEPT BIOSIMILAR) IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: COMPARISON BETWEEN CONTINUING SB4 AND SWITCHING FROM ETANERCEPT REFERENCE PRODUCT TO SB4
    Emery, P.
    Vencovsky, J.
    Sylwestrzak, A.
    Leszczynski, P.
    Porawska, W.
    Stasiuk, B.
    Hilt, J.
    Mosterova, Z.
    Cheong, S. Y.
    Ghil, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 236 - 236
  • [6] Comparing the immunogenicity of the etanercept biosimilar SB4 with the innovator etanercept: another consideration
    Marshall, Lisa
    Hickling, Timothy
    Bill, David
    Mahgoub, Ehab
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 (07) : E37 - U223
  • [7] Additional Efficacy Results of SB4 (Etanercept Biosimilar) up to Week 100: Comparison Between Continuing SB4 and Switching from Reference Etanercept (Enbrel®) to SB4
    Emery, Paul
    Vencovsky, Jiri
    Sylwestrzak, Anna
    Leszczynski, Piotr
    Porawska, Wieslawa
    Stasiuk, Barbara
    Hilt, Joanna
    Mosterova, Zdenka
    Cheong, Soo Yeon
    Ghil, Jeehoon
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of original and biosimilar etanercept (SB4) in active rheumatoid arthritis - A comparison in a real-world national cohort
    Codreanu, Catalin
    Popescu, Claudiu C.
    Mogosan, Corina
    Enache, Luminita
    Daia, Sanziana
    Ionescu, Ruxandra
    Opris-Belinski, Daniela
    [J]. BIOLOGICALS, 2019, 62 : 27 - 32
  • [9] Comparison between Continuing SB4 (Etanercept Biosimilar) and Switching from Reference Etanercept to SB4: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of SB4 from a Phase III Study
    Emery, Paul
    Vencovsky, Jiri
    Sylwestrzak, Anna
    Leszczynski, Piotr
    Porawska, Wieslawa
    Stasiuk, Barbara
    Hilt, Joanna
    Mosterova, Zdenka
    Cheong, Soo-Yeon
    Ghil, Jeehoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06) : 877 - 878
  • [10] SB4 (Benepali®; an etanercept biosimilar): a profile of its use
    Lyseng-Williamson K.A.
    McKeage K.
    [J]. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 2018, 34 (2) : 50 - 61