Multi-disciplinary Concurrent Management of Recurrent Hepatocellular Therapy is Superior to Sequential Therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Fields, Tyler D. [1 ]
Philips, Prejesh [1 ]
Scoggins, Charles R. [1 ]
Tatum, Cliff [1 ]
Kelly, Lawrence [1 ]
McMasters, Kelly M. [1 ]
Martin, Robert C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; INTRAHEPATIC RECURRENCE; MICROWAVE ABLATION; CARCINOMA; HEPATECTOMY; SURVIVAL; RESECTION; SORAFENIB; CANCER; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-016-3844-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after a patient's initial therapy, whether it is transplantation, resection, or ablation, remains a challenging clinical problem. Since recurrence occurs in 70% of all initially treated disease within 5 years, optimal management to treat this recurrence is needed. Currently, a bias exists toward mono-therapy (i.e., ablation alone, hepatic arterial therapy alone, or sorafenib therapy alone) instead of concurrent sequential therapy-as is common in other primary and metastatic disease to the liver. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the overall survival of recurrent HCC based on either mono-therapy or multimodality therapy. Methods A review of our prospective 2245 patient hepato-pancreatico-biliary database was performed for all patients who underwent treatment with curative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma and had complete recurrence treatment data from June 2002 to May 2015. Mono-therapy was defined as initiation of a solitary therapy until disease progression or intolerance. Multimodality therapy was defined as at least 2 therapies that occurred simultaneously or within 4 weeks of each therapy. Results A total of 281 patients underwent treatment with curative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma, in which 192 experienced recurrence. These patients were treated with either thermal ablation or liver resection (LR) (N = 51), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radiation (N = 68), systemic therapy (N = 26), or multimodality therapy (N = 47). The extent of the first recurrence was similar in regard to the number of tumors (median 1), the type of radiologic HCC, gender, BMI, and percentage of liver involvement. They differed in regard to size (MMT largest, median 5.6 cm, p = 0.02), and MMT had higher Hepatitis C involvement (37% of patients, p = 0.001). In evaluation of first recurrence treatment, after a median follow-up of 24 months, multimodality therapy has a significant improvement in overall survival (median 40 months, range 8-85), when compared to LR/Ablation (27 months, range 4-75), TACE/XRT (13 months, range 4-68), and systemic (26 months, range 3-59) (p = 0.003). Conclusion Multimodality therapy should be considered in all patients with recurrent HCC based on tumor biology and underlying hepatic reserve. Hepatocellular cancer should be treated like other hepatic malignancies in which concurrent therapies are utilized simultaneously to optimize oncologic effects (response rates and overall survival) and minimize quality-of-life side effects. Multimodality therapy can lead to far superior overall survival and is well tolerated in the majority of recurrent HCC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1339
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-disciplinary Concurrent Management of Recurrent Hepatocellular Therapy is Superior to Sequential Therapy
    Tyler D. Fields
    Prejesh Philips
    Charles R. Scoggins
    Cliff Tatum
    Lawrence Kelly
    Kelly M. McMasters
    Robert C. G. Martin
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2017, 41 : 1331 - 1339
  • [2] Multi-disciplinary therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Chen, KM
    [J]. HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 45 (24) : 1936 - 1936
  • [3] Liver-Directed Regional Therapy in the Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepatocellular Cancer
    Senthil, Maheswari
    Mailey, Brian
    Leong, Lucille
    Chung, Vincent
    Yen, Yun
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Marx, Howard
    Kim, Joseph
    [J]. CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2010, 6 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [4] Surgical therapy in transsexual patients: a multi-disciplinary approach
    Monstrey, S
    Hoebeke, P
    Dhont, M
    De Cuypere, G
    Rubens, R
    Moerman, M
    Hamdi, M
    Van Landuyt, K
    Blondeel, P
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2001, 101 (05) : 200 - 209
  • [5] Focal therapy, time to join the multi-disciplinary team discussion?
    Reddy, Deepika
    Bedi, Nishant
    Dudderidge, Tim
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1526 - +
  • [6] Breast Cancer: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach from Imaging to Therapy
    Tari, Daniele Ugo
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 598 - 602
  • [7] Multi-Disciplinary Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas
    Prendergast, Katherine M.
    Crago, Aimee M.
    [J]. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (11): : 417 - 424
  • [8] MANAGEMENT OF MULTI-DISCIPLINARY DESIGN TEAMS
    BAKER, FA
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1969, 44 (SEP): : 59 - &
  • [9] Encopresis: Multi-Disciplinary Management Comments
    Handley-More, Dottie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SCHOOLS AND EARLY INTERVENTION, 2009, 2 (02): : 96 - 102
  • [10] Multi-disciplinary management of rectal cancer
    Gambacorta, M. A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S78 - S79