Communication interventions for medically unexplained symptom conditions in general practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Byrne, Ailish Katherine [1 ]
Scantlebury, Arabella [1 ]
Jones, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Doherty, Laura [1 ]
Torgerson, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York Trials Unit, York, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry, W Midlands, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 11期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL SOMATIC SYMPTOMS; DOCTOR-PATIENT-RELATIONSHIP; PRIMARY-CARE; MANAGE PATIENTS; SOMATIZATION; PRACTITIONERS; REATTRIBUTION; ILLNESS; GPS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0277538
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) account for 3-50% of all General Practitioner (GP) consultations and are difficult to diagnose due to their unknown aetiology, symptom overlap between conditions, and lack of effective treatment options. MUS patients' and primary care clinicians frequently face challenges during consultations, with GPs reporting difficulty identifying and classifying MUS, whilst patients report stigma and feeling illegitimised by clinicians. Communication interventions have been proposed as a method to facilitate the doctor-patient relationship and aid the management of MUS. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care based communication interventions at improving MUS patients' and/or clinician outcomes. Method Four electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2021. Two researchers independently undertook screening, data extraction and quality appraisal. Given the heterogeneous nature of the studies identified, narrative syntheses were conducted, along with meta-analyses where possible to pool data. Results 9 papers from 10 Randomised Controlled Trials were included. The included studies displayed considerable risk of bias and poor reporting. Some limited evidence suggests that communication interventions tailored to MUS and not following a pre-specified model (such as reattribution) could improve pain, mental and physical functioning whilst reattribution training may improve clinician confidence treating MUS. However, methodological limitations mean that these findings should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion A range of interventions for improving communication with MUS patients in primary care have been evaluated. However, the heterogeneous nature of existing evidence and poor study quality mean we cannot conclude whether these interventions are effective. Before considering further randomised controlled trials researchers should focus on developing a new or modified communication intervention for MUS patients and their clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological interventions for medically unexplained physical symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaur, Tanveer
    Ranjan, Piyush
    Sarkar, Siddharth
    Kaloiya, Gauri Shanker
    Khan, Munnoo
    Aakansha
    Bhatia, Harpreet
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 77 : 92 - 101
  • [2] Interventions for carers of stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hall, J.
    Clarke, D.
    Forster, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2016, 11 : S62 - S62
  • [3] Effectiveness of technological interventions to improve healthcare communication with children with long-term conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Dorgeat, Emma
    Adeleye, Ayowade
    Lifford, Kate J.
    Edwards, Adrian
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (06) : 1411 - 1426
  • [4] Extended duration of thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Zayed, Yazan
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Barbarawi, Mahmoud
    Banifadel, Momen
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    Chahine, Adam
    Obeid, Michele
    Haykal, Tarek
    Yelangi, Anitha
    Malapati, Sindhu
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Seedahmed, Elfateh
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 50 (02) : 192 - 199
  • [5] A Systematic Literature Review & Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Broderick, P.
    Clark, H.
    Monaghan, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 122 - 122
  • [6] Interventions to Prevent Sports Related Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Leppanen, Mari
    Aaltonen, Sari
    Parkkari, Jari
    Heinonen, Ari
    Kujala, Urho M.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (04) : 473 - 486
  • [7] The effects of psychosocial interventions on death anxiety: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Menzies, Rachel E.
    Zuccala, Matteo
    Sharpe, Louise
    Dar-Nimrod, Ilan
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2018, 59 : 64 - 73
  • [8] Music listening interventions for physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Clark, Imogen N.
    Taylor, Nicholas F.
    Peiris, Casey L.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [9] Interventions for treating umbilical granuloma: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Namba, Fumihiko
    Miyahara, Naoyuki
    Haga, Mitsuhiro
    Ota, Erika
    Ikuta, Yasuhisa
    Mamahit, Citra Gabriella
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [10] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions in adult literacy and numeracy
    Torgerson, CJ
    Porthouse, J
    Brooks, G
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2003, 26 (03) : 234 - 255