A method for a precautionary assessment of aquifer vulnerability to pollution

被引:0
|
作者
Cameron, E. [1 ]
Garavaglia, L. [2 ]
Peloso, G. F. [3 ]
机构
[1] GeoStudio, Morbegno, SO, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Dept Environm Engn, Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Earth Sci, Pavia, Italy
关键词
aquifer vulnerability; uncertainty; precaution; fuzzy mathematics; possibility theory;
D O I
10.2495/WP060601
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The assessment of aquifer vulnerability to pollution is an important tool for protecting groundwater resources. Vulnerability may be underestimated due to uncertainties affecting this assessment, with potential adverse consequences for pollution prevention policies; in order to reduce the likelihood of vulnerability underestimation and protect the efficacy of such policies, a precautionary vulnerability value may be used as a reference for planning and design. This paper illustrates an approach for selecting such a precautionary vulnerability value, applied to the vulnerability point count system SINTACS R5 developed by the Italian National Research Council. The method uses possibility theory and fuzzy mathematics in order to: 1) define quantitative models of the uncertainties - including those of a subjective nature - regarding the parameters and partial ratings used to assess vulnerability; 2) to propagate the uncertainty to the final degree of vulnerability; 3) to calculate how much each vulnerability degree among the possible ones can be considered precautionary, starting from the definition of the level of precaution related to each degree. Vulnerability maps that correspond to different precaution degrees and can be generated automatically are illustrated, and some possible criteria for selecting an optimal degree are outlined.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:615 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of aquifer intrinsic vulnerability by the SINTACS method
    Kapelj, Sanja
    Loborec, Jelena
    Kapelj, Janislav
    GEOLOGIA CROATICA, 2013, 66 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [2] Sensitivity analysis for the GALDIT method based on the assessment of vulnerability to pollution in the northern Sfax coastal aquifer, Tunisia
    Mona Gontara
    Nabila Allouche
    Ikram Jmal
    Salelm Bouri
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9
  • [3] Sensitivity analysis for the GALDIT method based on the assessment of vulnerability to pollution in the northern Sfax coastal aquifer, Tunisia
    Gontara, Mona
    Allouche, Nabila
    Jmal, Ikram
    Bouri, Salelm
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 9 (05)
  • [4] Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using the drastic method in the rich alluvial aquifer (Central high atlas of morocco)
    El Kayssi Y.
    Hilali M.
    Kouz T.
    Kacimi I.
    Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 2020, 32 (04): : 317 - 334
  • [5] Aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Dahomey Basin using the RTt method
    S. A. Oke
    D. Vermeulen
    M. Gomo
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [6] Aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Dahomey Basin using the RTt method
    Oke, S. A.
    Vermeulen, D.
    Gomo, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (11)
  • [7] Evaluation of the vulnerability of the Western Mountain aquifer to pollution
    Bachmat, Y
    Wollman, SH
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 42 (1-2) : 417 - 421
  • [8] Groundwater vulnerability to pesticide pollution assessment in the alluvial aquifer of Western Bengal basin, India using overlay and index method
    Duttagupta, Srimanti
    Mukherjee, Abhijit
    Das, Kousik
    Dutta, Avishek
    Bhattacharya, Animesh
    Bhattacharya, Jayanta
    GEOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 80 (04):
  • [9] Regression model for aquifer vulnerability assessment of nitrate pollution in the Osona region (NE Spain)
    Boy-Roura, Merce
    Nolan, Bernard T.
    Mencio, Anna
    Mas-Pla, Josep
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 505 : 150 - 162
  • [10] IVAKY: INDEX OF VULNERABILITY TO POLLUTION OF YUCKIECAN KARSTIC AQUIFER
    Aguilar-Duarte, Y.
    Bautista, F.
    Mendoza, M. E.
    Frausto, O.
    Ihl, T.
    Delgado, C.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE INGENIERIA QUIMICA, 2016, 15 (03): : 913 - 933