Rotor Array Synergies for Aerial Modular Reconfigurable Robots

被引:0
|
作者
Moshirian, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Pounds, Pauline E. I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Elect Engn & Robot, QUT Ctr Robot, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Inst Robot, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
QUADROTOR;
D O I
10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9982034
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Aerial Modular Reconfigurable Robots (AMRRs) are scalable systems consisting of rotor modules capable of rearrangement during flight. The potential to dynamically change any shape for a given task poses the question: what arrangements offer the most aerodynamic benefit for the task of flying? Answering this requires understanding how adjacent rotors in various configurations influence each another. Intuitively, aerodynamic models such as momentum theory suggest that close rotor proximity decreases performance due to the upstream rotor flow fields interacting. However, effects such as vortex interaction or viscous flow entrainment (used by the Dyson bladeless fan) may offer benefits not captured by the modelling assumptions of computational analysis or simulation. Thus, this work takes an experimental approach, testing thrust performance of rotors in independent configurations of lines, square lattices, and hexagons with various inter-rotor spacings. It was found that inter-rotor spacing did not significantly change thrust performance, but that hexagonal arrangements outperformed line and grid lattices. Smoke tests indicated that hexagon configurations entrained air in the central cavity resulting in a thrust improvement. An inter-rotor spacing of 1.51 rotor diameters gave the best performance increase, roughly equal to that of an additional rotor. This suggests that by placing rotors in an array of six hollow hexagonal honeycombs, thrust performance could theoretically be increased by up to 27.3 per cent, for no additional mass.
引用
收藏
页码:1772 / 1779
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Programming for modular reconfigurable robots
    Gorbenko, A. A.
    Popov, V. Yu.
    PROGRAMMING AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, 2012, 38 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [2] Programming for modular reconfigurable robots
    A. A. Gorbenko
    V. Yu. Popov
    Programming and Computer Software, 2012, 38 : 13 - 23
  • [3] A Class of Modular Aerial Robots
    Naldi, Roberto
    Forte, Francesco
    Marconi, Lorenzo
    2011 50TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL AND EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (CDC-ECC), 2011, : 3584 - 3589
  • [4] Kinematics and dynamics of reconfigurable modular robots
    Fei, YQ
    Zhao, XF
    Xu, WL
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 3335 - 3341
  • [5] Modular Reconfigurable Robots in Space Applications
    Mark Yim
    Kimon Roufas
    David Duff
    Ying Zhang
    Craig Eldershaw
    Sam Homans
    Autonomous Robots, 2003, 14 : 225 - 237
  • [6] Neurofuzzy control of modular and reconfigurable robots
    Melek, WW
    Goldenberg, AA
    IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2003, 8 (03) : 381 - 389
  • [7] Inverse kinematics for modular reconfigurable robots
    Chen, IM
    Yang, G
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 1647 - 1652
  • [8] Kinematics and dynamics of reconfigurable modular robots
    Fei, YQ
    Zhao, XF
    Xu, WL
    1998 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, 1998, : 3325 - 3334
  • [9] Modular reconfigurable robots in space applications
    Yim, M
    Roufas, K
    Duff, D
    Zhang, Y
    Eldershaw, C
    Homans, S
    AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2003, 14 (2-3) : 225 - 237
  • [10] Research on Motion Planning for Modular Reconfigurable Robots
    Tang, Jianbing
    Hu, Qigao
    Zha, Yabing
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSORS, INSTRUMENT AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICSIIT 2015), 2015, : 299 - 304