Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion

被引:48
|
作者
Briguez, Cristian E. [1 ,2 ]
Budan, Maximiliano C. D. [1 ,2 ]
Deagustini, Cristhian A. D. [1 ,2 ]
Maguitman, Ana G. [1 ,2 ]
Capobianco, Marcela [1 ,2 ]
Simari, Guillermo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Artificial Intelligence Res & Dev Lab, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Defeasible argumentation; Recommender systems; Qualitative vs quantitative recommendations; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.046
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recommender systems have become prevalent in recent years as they help users to access relevant items from the vast universe of possibilities available these days. Most existing research in this area is based purely on quantitative aspects such as indices of popularity or measures of similarity between items or users. This work introduces a novel perspective on movie recommendation that combines a basic quantitative method with a qualitative approach, resulting in a family of mixed character recommender systems. The proposed framework incorporates the use of arguments in favor or against recommendations to determine if a suggestion should be presented or not to a user. In order to accomplish this, Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) is adopted as the underlying formalism to model facts and rules about the recommendation domain and to compute the argumentation process. This approach has a number features that could be proven useful in recommendation settings. In particular, recommendations can account for several different aspects (e.g., the cast, the genre or the rating of a movie), considering them all together through a dialectical analysis. Moreover, the approach can stem for both content-based or collaborative filtering techniques, or mix them in any arbitrary way. Most importantly, explanations supporting each recommendation can be provided in a way that can be easily understood by the user, by means of the computed arguments. In this work the proposed approach is evaluated obtaining very positive results. This suggests a great opportunity to exploit the benefits of transparent explanations and justifications in recommendations, sometimes unrealized by quantitative methods. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6467 / 6482
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Argument-based critics and recommenders:: A qualitative perspective on user support systems
    Chesnevar, Carlos Ivan
    Maguitman, Ana Gabriela
    Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
    [J]. DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2006, 59 (02) : 293 - 319
  • [2] AN ARGUMENT-BASED APPROACH TO VALIDITY
    KANE, MT
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) : 527 - 535
  • [3] The Argument-Based Approach to Validation
    Kane, Michael
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 42 (04) : 448 - 457
  • [4] Argument-based machine learning
    Bratko, Ivan
    Mozina, Martin
    Zabkar, Jure
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4203 : 11 - 17
  • [5] Argument-based learning communities
    Mahalakshmi, G. S.
    Geetha, T. V.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2009, 22 (04) : 316 - 323
  • [6] Challenges to assessing motivation in MOOC learners: An application of an argument-based approach
    Douglas, Kerrie A.
    Merzdorf, Hillary E.
    Hicks, Nathan M.
    Sarfraz, Muhammad Ihsanulhaq
    Bermel, Peter
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 150
  • [7] Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
    Carbogim, DV
    Robertson, D
    Lee, J
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2000, 15 (02): : 119 - 149
  • [8] Argument-based generation and explanation of recommendations
    Segura-Tinoco, Andres
    [J]. 15TH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS (RECSYS 2021), 2021, : 845 - 850
  • [9] An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
    Dung, PM
    Son, TC
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 133 (1-2) : 35 - 85
  • [10] Argument-based validation in testing and assessment
    Belwalkar, Bharati B.
    [J]. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 74 (03) : 643 - 645