A discussion about thermal comfort evaluation in a bus terminal

被引:18
|
作者
Cardoso, Vitor E. M. [1 ]
Ramos, Nuno M. M. [1 ]
Almeida, Ricardo M. S. F. [1 ,2 ]
Barreira, Eva [1 ]
Martins, Joao Pocas [3 ]
Lurdes Simoes, M. [1 ]
Sanhudo, Luis [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Engn FEUP, CONSTRUCT LFC, Rua Dr Roberto Frias S-N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[2] Polytech Inst Viseu, Sch Technol & Management, Dept Civil Engn, Campus Politecn Repeses, P-3504510 Viseu, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn FEUP, CONSTRUCT GEQUALTEC, Rua Dr Roberto Frias S-N, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Transport station; Thermal comfort; Steady-state models; Adaptive models; Questionnaire; Semi-outdoor environment; Transient spaces; AIR-CONDITIONED BUILDINGS; ADAPTIVE MODEL; INDOOR; FIELD; TEMPERATURE; PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; ADAPTATION; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Transport stations are distributive hubs composed of transient spaces, often not fully indoor, where most users spend time waiting to travel or waiting for travelers. The aim of this article is to present a comparison between thermal comfort evaluation methods applied in a free running bus terminal located in a mild climate country. Data was collected in field measurements and surveys were performed on 240 passengers, focusing warm season operation conditions. The collected information allowed for the analysis of the comfort conditions of the station according to the following comfort models: PMV-PPD, aPMV, and the adaptive models defined in the ASHRAE 55 and EN 15251 standards. A comparison between the results and the thermal preference (MTP) and the thermal sensation (MTS) expressed in the ISO 10551 subjective scales was performed. It could be concluded that the PMV-PPD and aPMV models overestimated the cooling sensation. The ASHRAE 55 and EN 15251 adaptive approach, although more permissive, still was not totally in line with the thermal sensation of the respondents. An alternative approach based on the correlation between SET* and dissatisfied voters established through the thermal preference method provided a wider comfort range that appears, in this case, to be adequate. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] About Evaluation of Thermal Comfort of Fiber Products
    Tamura, Teruko
    SEN-I GAKKAISHI, 2020, 76 (05) : 175 - 175
  • [2] THERMAL COMFORT OF BUS PASSENGERS
    GUTASHSHI, A
    ERGONOMICS, 1979, 22 (06) : 759 - 759
  • [4] Evaluation of thermal comfort in a rail terminal location in India
    Deb, Chirag
    Ramachandraiah, A.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (11) : 2571 - 2580
  • [5] AN EVALUATION OF COMFORT OF A BUS SEAT
    ZHAO, JH
    TANG, L
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1994, 25 (06) : 386 - 392
  • [6] Thermal comfort evaluation of an existing glazed airport terminal in Thailand
    Pichatwatana, Kittitach
    Wang, Fan
    Roaf, Sue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 172 (04) : 184 - 197
  • [7] Discussion About Evaluation Method of Traffic Efficiency Adaptability of Bus Lane
    Yu, Bai
    Kun, Xue
    ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 566 - 570
  • [8] Evaluation of the felt comfort on a bus: A preliminary study
    Bodini, Ileana
    Lancini, Matteo
    Magalini, Andrea
    Vetturi, David
    ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2007 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON CREATIVITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AND ETHICS OF ENGINEERS, 2007, : 95 - 96
  • [9] A Review of Thermal Comfort Applied in Bus Cabin Environments
    Almeida, Matheus das Neves
    de Paula Xavier, Antonio Augusto
    Michaloski, Ariel Orlei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (23): : 1 - 21
  • [10] A Review about Thermal Comfort in Aircraft
    Fan Juli
    Zhou Qiongyao
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (02) : 169 - 183