Performance of InBios ZIKV Detect™ 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA in two reference laboratories compared to the original ZIKV Detect™ IgM Capture ELISA

被引:7
|
作者
Basile, Alison Jane [1 ]
Ao, Jingning [2 ]
Horiuchi, Kalanthe [1 ]
Semenova, Vera [2 ]
Steward-Clark, Evelene [2 ]
Schiffer, Jarad [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Vector Borne Dis, Ft Collins, CO USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Bacterial Dis, Microbial Pathogenesis & Immune Response Lab, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Zika; ELISA; InBios; Version; 2.0; IgM; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; DENGUE VIRUS; ANTIBODIES; INFECTION; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.05.011
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
ZIKV Detect (TM) 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA (InBios International, Seattle, WA) recently replaced the ZIKV Detect (TM) IgM Capture ELISA and a number of significant changes have been made to the original version. This study compares data generated from the ZIKV Detect (TM) 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA, to data generated using the original version of the kit. The same sample sets were used in this comparison, and reference test results for these samples were used to assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and concordance of results across two laboratories. Average sensitivity increased from 90.4% to 92.5% with the updated kit where the increase was not statistically different, and specificity increased from 79.5% to 97.4%, a statistically-significant difference. Accuracy of the ZIKV Detect (TM) 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA was 89% compared to 63.9% for the original version of the kit, and agreement across the laboratories increased from 79.5% to 97.4%. With secondary dengue virus infections, specificity increased from 9.3% to 82.6% with the updated kit, primarily due to the change in interpretation criteria that no longer includes "Possible Zika positive."
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] ZIKV Detect 2.0 IgM Capture ELISA
    Larose-Pierre, Margareth
    Carter, Chenita
    Honeywell, Marion S.
    [J]. US PHARMACIST, 2019, 44 (08) : 36 - 38
  • [2] INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE INBIOS LYME DETECT™ IGM IGG ELISA FOR DETECTION OF LYME DISEASE
    Reyes, Dindo
    Ireton, Gregory
    Needham, James
    Raychaudhuri, Syamal
    Vallur, Aarthy C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2021, 105 (05): : 315 - 315
  • [3] Diagnostic Accuracy of the InBios Scrub Typhus Detect (TM) ELISA for the Detection of IgM Antibodies in Chittagong, Bangladesh
    Blacksell, Stuart D.
    Kingston, Hugh W. F.
    Tanganuchitcharnchai, Ampai
    Phanichkrivalkosil, Meghna
    Hossain, Mosharraf
    Hossain, Amir
    Ghose, Aniruddha
    Leopold, Stije J.
    Dondorp, Arjen M.
    Day, Nicholas P. J.
    Paris, Daniel H.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 3 (03)
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of the equine IgM capture ELISA for serodiagnosis of West Nile virus infection
    Long, Maureen T.
    Jeter, William
    Hernandez, Jorge
    Sellon, Debra C.
    Gosche, David
    Gillis, Karen
    Bille, Emily
    Gibbs, E. Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 20 (03) : 608 - 613
  • [5] Capture ELISA for PR3-ANCA is superior to detect and predict relapses of systemic vasculitis compared with direct ELISA
    Selga, Daina
    Segelmark, Marten
    [J]. APMIS, 2009, 117 : 177 - 177
  • [6] Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and its associated factors of a commercial anti-EV-A71 IgM-capture ELISA kit in hospitalized children with clinical diagnostic HFMD
    Zhang, Tianchen
    Cheng, Yibing
    Li, Yu
    Yang, Junmei
    Liang, Lu
    Yang, Jianli
    Cui, Peng
    Song, Chunlan
    Zhou, Yonghong
    Kang, Di
    Qiu, Qi
    Cui, Ninghua
    Guo, Chun
    Jing, Yu
    Zeng, Mengyao
    Liu, Qianqian
    Long, Lu
    Zhou, Chongchen
    Yu, Hongjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 130