Ethics in perinatal medicine: A global perspective

被引:9
|
作者
Chervenak, Frank A. [1 ]
McCullough, Laurence B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2015年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
Autonomy; Beneficence; Healthcare justice; Professional responsibility; Perinatal ethics; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.siny.2015.05.003
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
This article describes the professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics, which requires the perinatologist in all cases to identify and balance beneficence-based and autonomy-based obligations to the pregnant patient, beneficence-based obligations to the fetal patient, and beneficence-based obligations to the neonatal patient. We explain how this model avoids the clinical failure of both fetal and maternal rights-based reductionism, i.e., insistence either on unlimited fetal rights or on unlimited maternal rights, respectively. The professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics provides the basis for the transnational clinical ethical concept of healthcare justice, which requires that beneficence-based obligations to all patients be routinely fulfilled by providing them with an evidence-based standard of care. We then show how healthcare justice can be used to identify and address ethically unacceptable allocation of healthcare resources. The professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics creates an important role for the perinatologist as responsible advocate for pregnant, fetal, and neonatal patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 367
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条