Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

被引:36
|
作者
Lee, Sandy C. [1 ]
Grant, Edward [1 ]
Sheth, Pulin [1 ]
Garcia, Agustin A. [3 ]
Desai, Bhushan [1 ]
Ji, Lingyun [2 ]
Groshen, Susan [2 ]
Hwang, Darryl [1 ]
Yamashita, Mary [1 ]
Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 1441 Eastlake Ave,Ground Floor,G360, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, 1441 Eastlake Ave,Ground Floor,G360, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Sect Hematol Oncol, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
breast cancer; breast ultrasound; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasound; METAANALYSIS; SIZE;
D O I
10.7863/ultra.16.05060
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis pilot study compared contrast enhanced ultrasound (US) with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing the treatment response in patients with breast cancer receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MethodsThis prospective Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study included 30 patients, from January 2014 to October 2015, with invasive breast cancer detected by mammography, conventional US imaging, or both and scheduled for NAC. Informed consent was obtained. Contrast-enhanced US (perflutren lipid microspheres, 10 L/kg) and MRI (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.1 mmol/kg) scans were performed at baseline before starting NAC and after completing NAC before surgery. Results of the imaging techniques were compared with each other and with histopathologic findings obtained at surgery using the Spearman correlation. Tumor size and enhancement parameters were compared for 15 patients with contrast-enhanced US, MRI, and surgical pathologic findings. ResultsThe median tumor size at baseline was 3.1 cm on both contrast-enhanced US and MRI scans. The Spearman correlation showed strong agreement in tumor size at baseline between contrast-enhanced US and MRI (r=0.88; P<.001) but less agreement in tumor size after NAC (r=0.66; P=.004). Trends suggested that contrast-enhanced US (r=0.75; P<.001) had a better correlation than MRI (r=0.42; P=.095) with tumor size at surgery. Contrast-enhanced US was as effective as MRI in predicting a complete pathologic response (4 patients; 75.0% accuracy for both) and a non-complete pathologic response (11 patients; 72.7% accuracy for both). ConclusionsContrast enhanced US is a valuable imaging modality for assessing the treatment response in patients receiving NAC and had a comparable correlation as MRI with breast cancer size at surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 911
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer
    Shi, Xian-Quan
    Dong, Yunyun
    Tan, Xiaoqu
    Yang, Peipei
    Wang, Chunmei
    Feng, Wei
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Qian, Linxue
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 82 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [2] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Fu, Juzhong
    Fan, Ming
    Zheng, Bin
    Shao, Guoliang
    Zhang, Juan
    Li, Lihua
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: PACS AND IMAGING INFORMATICS: NEXT GENERATION AND INNOVATIONS, 2016, 9789
  • [3] Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer using a combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Han, Xue
    Yang, Huajing
    Jin, Shiyang
    Sun, Yunfeng
    Zhang, Hongxia
    Shan, Ming
    Cheng, Wen
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02): : 1389 - 1398
  • [4] Radiomics of Tumor Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Fan, Ming
    Chen, Hang
    You, Chao
    Liu, Li
    Gu, Yajia
    Peng, Weijun
    Gao, Xin
    Li, Lihua
    FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 8
  • [5] Evaluation of the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: Correlation Between Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Tumor Cellularity
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Won Kyung
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (01) : E115 - E121
  • [6] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Early Prediction of Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Lee, Youn Joo
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Kim, Yun Ju
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2019, 40 (02): : 193 - 204
  • [7] Early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer
    Peng, Juan
    Pu, Huan
    Jia, Yan
    Chen, Chuang
    Ke, Xiao-Kang
    Zhou, Qing
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (19)
  • [8] Effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    LIU Yin-hua
    YE Jing-ming
    XU Ling
    HUANG Qing-yun
    ZHAO Jian-xin
    DUAN Xue-ning
    QIN Nai-shan
    WANG Xiao-ying
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2011, (02) : 194 - 198
  • [9] Effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Liu Yin-hua
    Ye Jing-ming
    Xu Ling
    Huang Qing-yun
    Zhao Jian-xin
    Duan Xue-ning
    Qin Nai-shan
    Wang Xiao-ying
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [10] Effects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound treatment on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Rix, Anne
    Piepenbrock, Marion
    Flege, Barbara
    von Stillfried, Saskia
    Koczera, Patrick
    Opacic, Tatjana
    Simons, Nina
    Boor, Peter
    Thoroe-Boveleth, Sven
    Deckers, Roel
    May, Jan-Niklas
    Lammers, Twan
    Schmitz, Georg
    Stickeler, Elmar
    Kiessling, Fabian
    THERANOSTICS, 2021, 11 (19): : 9557 - 9570