Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation

被引:6
|
作者
Koertje, Monika [1 ]
Baumann, Uwe [1 ]
Stoever, Timo [2 ]
Weissgerber, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, ENT Dept, Audiol Acoust, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, ENT Dept, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 10期
关键词
SOUND SOURCE LOCALIZATION; TEMPORAL-FINE-STRUCTURE; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; AUDITORY-SYSTEM; NORMAL-HEARING; NOISE; CUES; LISTENERS; RESPONSES; ENVELOPE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0241015
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives In this study, localization accuracy and sensitivity to acoustic interaural time differences (ITDs) in subjects using cochlear implants with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) were assessed and compared with the results of a normal hearing control group. Methods Eight CI users with EAS (2 bilaterally implanted, 6 unilaterally implanted) and symmetric binaural acoustic hearing and 24 normal hearing subjects participated in the study. The first experiment determined mean localization error (MLE) for different angles of sound incidence between +/- 60 degrees (frontal and dorsal presentation). The stimuli were either low-pass, high-pass or broadband noise bursts. In a second experiment, just noticeable differences (JND) of ITDs were measured for pure tones of 125 Hz, 250 Hz and 500 Hz (headphone presentation). Results Experiment 1: MLE of EAS subjects was 8.5 degrees, 14.3 degrees and 14.7 degrees, (low-, high-pass and broadband stimuli respectively). In the control group, MLE was 1.8 degrees (broadband stimuli). In the differentiation between sound incidence from front and back, EAS subjects performed on chance level. Experiment 2: The JND-ITDs were 88.7 mu s for 125 Hz, 48.8 mu s for 250 Hz and 52.9 mu s for 500 Hz (EAS subjects). Compared to the control group, JND-ITD for 125 Hz was on the same level of performance. No statistically significant correlation was found between MLE and JND-ITD in the EAS cohort. Conclusions Near to normal ITD sensitivity in the lower frequency acoustic hearing was demonstrated in a cohort of EAS users. However, in an acoustic localization task, the majority of the subjects did not reached the level of accuracy of normal hearing. Presumably, signal processing time delay differences between devices used on both sides are deteriorating the transfer of precise binaural timing cues.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation
    Francart, Tom
    Brokx, Jan
    Wouters, Jan
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 10 (01): : 131 - 141
  • [2] Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation
    Tom Francart
    Jan Brokx
    Jan Wouters
    [J]. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2009, 10 : 131 - 141
  • [3] Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing
    Imsiecke, Marina
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 364 : 25 - 37
  • [4] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Tejani, Viral D.
    Yang, Hyejin
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    Hernandez, Helin
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Abbas, Paul J.
    Brown, Carolyn J.
    [J]. JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01): : 95 - 118
  • [5] Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing
    Viral D. Tejani
    Hyejin Yang
    Jeong-Seo Kim
    Helin Hernandez
    Jacob J. Oleson
    Marlan R. Hansen
    Bruce J. Gantz
    Paul J. Abbas
    Carolyn J. Brown
    [J]. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2022, 23 : 95 - 118
  • [6] Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences
    Noel, Victor A.
    Eddington, Donald K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 133 (04): : 2314 - 2328
  • [7] Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences
    [J]. Noel, V.A. (victor_noel@meei.harvard.edu), 1600, Acoustical Society of America (133):
  • [8] The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing
    Kipping, Daniel
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Nogueira, Waldo
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 395
  • [9] Acoustic factors affecting interaural level differences for cochlear-implant users
    Mayo, Paul G.
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (04): : EL357 - EL362
  • [10] Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation. Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions
    Rader, T.
    [J]. HNO, 2015, 63 (02) : 85 - 93