A Step Towards a General Framework for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment

被引:20
|
作者
Rajagopal, Deepak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, 300 La Kretz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
life cycle assessment (LCA); policy analysis; energy; renewable energy; price effects; industrial ecology; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; EQUILIBRIUM-MODELS; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; POLICY; LCA; ENERGY; BIOENERGY; MARKET; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12433
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
At the core of consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) is a model of the economic system of which the activity that motivates the CLCA is a part. While there are several applications of CLCA in the literature, there does not appear to exist a formal, general mathematical framework. To address this gap, this article presents a general multi-market equilibrium framework, which could be adapted to an arbitrary level of complexity depending on the context and data availability. A general expression for total pollution (of a given type) is derived, which highlights different factors that determine the impact on emissions. It is then illustrated how microeconomic theory can help predict the direction of price and quantity changes for each commodity within the modeled system simply based on an activity's relationship to the ultimate activity or service, which motivates the CLCA. The steps involved in converting the multi-market framework to general equilibrium are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 271
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    J. Mason Earles
    Anthony Halog
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 445 - 453
  • [2] Consequential life cycle assessment: a review
    Earles, J. Mason
    Halog, Anthony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (05): : 445 - 453
  • [3] A spatiotemporally differentiated product system modelling framework for consequential life cycle assessment
    Hackenhaar, Isadora Correa
    Almenar, Javier Babi
    Elliot, Thomas
    Rugani, Benedetto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 333
  • [4] Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment
    Crenna, Eleonora
    Sala, Serenella
    Polce, Chiara
    Collina, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 525 - 536
  • [5] Two sides of the same coin: consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework
    Yang, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 127 : 274 - 281
  • [6] Consequential Life Cycle Optimization: General Conceptual Framework and Application to Algal Renewable Diesel Production
    Gong, Jian
    You, Fengqi
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (07): : 5887 - 5911
  • [7] Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology
    Bauer, C.
    Buchgeister, J.
    Hischier, R.
    Poganietz, W. R.
    Schebek, L.
    Warsen, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (8-9) : 910 - 926
  • [8] A Heuristic Screening Aid for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment
    Rajagopal, Deepak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (06) : 1295 - 1306
  • [9] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yang, Yi
    Heijungs, Reinout
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (04): : 751 - 758
  • [10] On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment
    Yi Yang
    Reinout Heijungs
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 751 - 758