Extubation Success in Premature Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated With Bi-Level Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation

被引:20
|
作者
Thomas, Patricia E. [1 ,2 ]
LeFlore, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Nursing, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Pediatrix Med Grp, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
bi-level; continuous positive airway pressure; extubation; nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; respiratory distress syndrome; CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE; RISK-FACTORS; PREVENTION; MORTALITY; FAILURE; WORK; CPAP; FLOW;
D O I
10.1097/JPN.0b013e3182a983f0
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Infants born prematurely with respiratory distress syndrome are at high risk for complications from mechanical ventilation. Strategies are needed to minimize their days on the ventilator. The purpose of this study was to compare extubation success rates in infants treated with 2 different types of continuous positive airway pressure devices. A retrospective cohort study design was used. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records for patients in a large, metropolitan, level III neonatal intensive care unit. A sample of 194 premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome was selected, 124 of whom were treated with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and 70 with bi-level variable flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure (bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure). Infants in both groups had high extubation success rates (79% of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation group and 77% of bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure group). Although infants in the bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure group were extubated sooner, there was no difference in duration of oxygen therapy between the 2 groups. Promoting early extubation and extubation success is a vital strategy to reduce complications of mechanical ventilation that adversely affect premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 334
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome
    Kishore, M. Sai Sunil
    Dutta, Sourabh
    Kumar, Praveen
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2009, 98 (09) : 1412 - 1415
  • [2] Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Dursun, Mesut
    Uslu, Sinan
    Bulbul, Ali
    Celik, Muhittin
    Zubarioglu, Umut
    Bas, Evrim Kiray
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2019, 65 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [3] Non-Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) After Extubation in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Ilhan, Ozkan
    Ozdemir, Senem Alkan
    Akbay, Sinem
    Kanar, Berat
    Memur, Seyma
    Bor, Meltem
    Ozer, Esra Arun
    [J]. IZMIR DR BEHCET UZ COCUK HASTANESI DERGISI, 2019, 9 (03): : 175 - 182
  • [4] Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a rescue therapy after nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in infants with respiratory distress syndrome
    Ishigami, Ana Catarina
    Meneses, Jucille
    Alves, Joao Guilherme
    Carvalho, Juliana
    Cavalcanti, Emidio
    Bhandari, Vineet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [5] Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a rescue therapy after nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in infants with respiratory distress syndrome
    Ana Catarina Ishigami
    Jucille Meneses
    João Guilherme Alves
    Juliana Carvalho
    Emídio Cavalcanti
    Vineet Bhandari
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2023, 43 : 311 - 316
  • [6] Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation
    Kahramaner, Zelal
    Erdemir, Aydin
    Turkoglu, Ebru
    Cosar, Hese
    Sutcuoglu, Sumer
    Ozer, Esra Arun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (09): : 926 - 929
  • [7] A Comparison between Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Farhat, Ahmad Shah
    Mohammadzadeh, Ashraf
    Saeidi, Reza
    Noorizadeh, Shadi
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATOLOGY, 2015, 6 (04) : 1 - 6
  • [8] Randomized controlled trial comparing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants after tracheal extubation
    Rizzo Komatsu, Daniela Franco
    De Albuquerque Diniz, Edna Maria
    Archanjo Ferraro, Alexandre
    Jurvest Rivero Ceccon, Maria Esther
    Costa Vaz, Flavio Adolfo
    [J]. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 62 (06): : 568 - 574
  • [9] NOCTURNAL NASAL INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION WITH BI-LEVEL POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE (BIPAP) IN RESPIRATORY-FAILURE
    WALDHORN, RE
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (02) : 516 - 521
  • [10] Safety of bubble nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants with respiratory distress
    John, Stephen C.
    Garg, Mehak
    Muttineni, Mounika
    Brearley, Ann M.
    Rao, Praveen
    Bhandari, Vineet
    Slusher, Tina
    Murki, Srinivas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (9) : 1252 - 1257