Closed-Loop Decoder Adaptation Shapes Neural Plasticity for Skillful Neuroprosthetic Control

被引:162
|
作者
Orsborn, Amy L. [1 ]
Moorman, Helene G. [2 ]
Overduin, Simon A. [3 ]
Shanechi, Maryam M. [3 ]
Dimitrov, Dragan F. [4 ]
Carmena, Jose M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, UC Berkeley UCSF Joint Grad Program Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Helen Wills Neurosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE; MACHINE INTERFACES; VOLITIONAL CONTROL; CORTICAL CONTROL; NETWORKS; DESIGN; ARM;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.048
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Neuroplasticity may play a critical role in developing robust, naturally controlled neuroprostheses. This learning, however, is sensitive to system changes such as the neural activity used for control. The ultimate utility of neuroplasticity in real-world neuroprostheses is thus unclear. Adaptive decoding methods hold promise for improving neuroprosthetic performance in nonstationary systems. Here, we explore the use of decoder adaptation to shape neuroplasticity in two scenarios relevant for real-world neuroprostheses: nonstationary recordings of neural activity and changes in control context. Nonhuman primates learned to control a cursor to perform a reaching task using semistationary neural activity in two contexts: with and without simultaneous arm movements. Decoder adaptation was used to improve initial performance and compensate for changes in neural recordings. We show that beneficial neuroplasticity can occur alongside decoder adaptation, yielding performance improvements, skill retention, and resistance to interference from native motor networks. These results highlight the utility of neuroplasticity for real-world neuroprostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1393
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Control Strategies in Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetic Systems
    Wright, James
    Macefield, Vaughan G.
    van Schaik, Andre
    Tapson, Jonathan C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [2] Closed-Loop Control of a Neuroprosthetic Hand by Magnetoencephalographic Signals
    Fukuma, Ryohei
    Yanagisawa, Takufumi
    Yorifuji, Shiro
    Kato, Ryu
    Yokoi, Hiroshi
    Hirata, Masayuki
    Saitoh, Youichi
    Kishima, Haruhiko
    Kamitani, Yukiyasu
    Yoshimine, Toshiki
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [3] CLOSED-LOOP ADAPTATION APPLIED TO MISSILE CONTROL
    WAYMEYER, WK
    SPORING, RW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1963, AC 8 (02) : 157 - &
  • [4] Multisession, noninvasive closed-loop neuroprosthetic control of grasping by upper limb amputees
    Agashe, H. A.
    Paek, A. Y.
    Contreras-Vidal, J. L.
    [J]. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES: LAB EXPERIMENTS TO REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS, 2016, 228 : 107 - 128
  • [5] Multifunctional Neural Interfaces for Closed-Loop Control of Neural Activity
    Chapman, Christopher A. R.
    Goshi, Noah
    Seker, Erkin
    [J]. ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2018, 28 (12)
  • [6] Design and Analysis of Closed-Loop Decoder Adaptation Algorithms for Brain-Machine Interfaces
    Dangi, Siddharth
    Orsborn, Amy L.
    Moorman, Helene G.
    Carmena, Jose M.
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2013, 25 (07) : 1693 - 1731
  • [7] Emergence of Coordinated Neural Dynamics Underlies Neuroprosthetic Learning and Skillful Control
    Athalye, Vivek R.
    Ganguly, Karunesh
    Costa, Rui M.
    Carmena, Jose M.
    [J]. NEURON, 2017, 93 (04) : 955 - +
  • [8] Neural Control: Closed-Loop Human Brain Reading
    Foeldiak, Peter
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : R80 - R81
  • [9] The repeatability of closed-loop accommodative adaptation
    Portello, JK
    Rosenfeld, M
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U709 - U709
  • [10] Closed-Loop Adaptation for Robust Tracking
    Fan, Jialue
    Shen, Xiaohui
    Wu, Ying
    [J]. COMPUTER VISION-ECCV 2010, PT I, 2010, 6311 : 411 - 424