Laboratory tests on conditioning the sandy cobble soil for EPB shield tunnelling and its field application

被引:35
|
作者
Xu, Qianwei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lianyang [2 ]
Zhu, Hehua [3 ]
Gong, Zhengyu [4 ]
Liu, Jianguo [1 ]
Zhu, Yaohong [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Rail Infrastruct Durabil & Syst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Tongji Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Five Iron Grp Elect Serv City Link Engn Co Ltd, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Jinan Rail Transit Grp Co Ltd, Jinan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shield tunnel; Earth pressure balance; Soil conditioning; Bentonite slurry; Foam; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; TBM PERFORMANCE; MACHINE; FEASIBILITY; MOVEMENTS; SHANGHAI; BEHAVIOR; CLAYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2020.103512
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
During the construction of the interconnection tunnel from Tianqiao Station to Yongdingmen Station of Metro Line 8 in Beijing, the Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) shield machine had to excavate in sandy cobble soil. Because the sandy cobble soil has varying moisture content along the tunnel route and shows the characteristics of loose particle structure, large pores and no cohesion between the cobble particles, it is difficult to stabilize the support pressure acting on the cutting face and transport the muck. To effectively and efficiently use the EPB tunnelling in such situations, a series of laboratory tests on conditioning the sandy cobble soil to a reasonable quality were conducted, and the influence of water content and additive amount on the conditioning effectiveness was studied. Based on the test results, the optimal soil conditioning schemes corresponding to the water content of different soil groups were proposed. Finally, the laboratory test results were used to guide the soil conditioning in the field and the measured field data showed that the conditioned material fulfills the required standard for an EPB application.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling – An overview of laboratory tests
    Peila, Daniele
    Martinelli, Daniele
    Todaro, Carmine
    Luciani, Andrea
    [J]. Geomechanik und Tunnelbau, 2019, 12 (05): : 491 - 498
  • [2] Laboratory tests for EPB tunnelling soil conditioning
    Vinai, R.
    Peila, D.
    Oggeri, C.
    Pelizza, S.
    [J]. UNDERGROUND SPACE - THE 4TH DIMENSION OF METROPOLISES, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 273 - 278
  • [3] Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling
    D. Peila
    [J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2014, 18 : 831 - 836
  • [4] Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunnelling
    Peila, D.
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (03) : 831 - 836
  • [5] Advanced technology of soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling
    Langmaack, L
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN TUNNELING 2000: UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION: THE REVOLUTION CONTINUES, 2000, : 525 - 542
  • [6] Soil conditioning tests of clay for EPB tunnelling
    Todaro, C.
    Carigi, A.
    Peila, L.
    Martinelli, D.
    Peila, D.
    [J]. UNDERGROUND SPACE, 2022, 7 (04) : 483 - 497
  • [7] Soil conditioning for EPB tunnelling in coarse grained soils based on laboratory model tests
    Merritt, A. S.
    Jefferis, S. A.
    Storry, R. B.
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 2021, : 788 - 795
  • [8] Soil Conditioning for EPB Mechanized Tunnelling: comparison of laboratory tests and job site results
    Picchio, A.
    Boscaro, A.
    Peila, D.
    [J]. GALLERIE E GRANDI OPERE SOTTERRANEE, 2013, (107): : 91 - 92
  • [9] Soil Conditioning for EPB Shield Tunneling in Coastal Silty Clay Strata: Laboratory Research and Field Application
    Lu, Yao
    Huang, Ming
    Huang, Peiwen
    Xu, Chaoshui
    Wang, Yu
    Hu, Yanfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2024, 24 (02)
  • [10] Laboratory Model Test of EPB Shield Tunneling in a Cobble-Rich Soil
    Hu, Xiongyu
    He, Chuan
    Walton, Gabriel
    Fang, Yong
    Dai, Guanghui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (10)