A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: A preliminary report

被引:50
|
作者
Kusnoto, B
Figueroa, AA
Polley, JW
机构
[1] Rush Craniofacial Ctr, Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Dent, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Orthodont, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Cook Cty Hosp, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
hemifacial microsomia; mandible; distraction osteogenesis; growth; three-dimensional;
D O I
10.1097/00001665-199911000-00006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyzed in three dimensions the longitudinal growth pattern of young patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) before and after mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO). Six individuals with HFM (five boys and one girl; age at distraction, 12.5 +/- 2.4 years) were treated with similar procedures (surgery, type and direction of distraction, no functional orthodontic treatment before and after DO). Two individuals who did not undergo DO until late in their growth were used to compare growth patterns. In addition, one individual besides the six previously chosen sample in whom no DO was performed was also used to compare longitudinal growth patterns. Lateral and posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms were utilized preoperatively, spanning a period of 9 years. Computerized three-dimensional models were constructed from the lateral and PA cephalograms using a vector intercept algorithm. In the comparison group, for a period of 8 years on the affected side, the ramus height, body length, and total mandibular length increased at an average rate of 1.3, 1.9, and 3.0 mm per year respectively, On the unaffected side, the ramus height increased by 2.1 mn per year, 1.9 mm in the body, and 2.9 mm per year in total mandibular length. On average, the genial angle on the affected side was increased by 1 deg per year, yet decreased by 1 deg per year on the unaffected side. The proportions between the affected to the unaffected side were maintained. In the six individuals 18 months after DO, it was found that the ramus height was reduced by 1.0 mm, whereas the body was found to resume its growth with a faster rate on the distracted side, maintaining its proportion. Angular changes demonstrated closing of the genial angle on both the unaffected (0.5 deg) and distracted (3.5 deg) sides. Observed in three dimensions were the following: (1) On average, unoperated patients with isolated HFM tend to maintain their asymmetrical facial proportions and do not worsen substantially with time. (2) Different treatment effects were seen on the ramus, body, and total length of the mandible: changes in body length > ramus height > total length. (3) Eighteen months after DO, the correction was stable but with some degree of settling back from the initial overcorrection (<5%). (4) Eighteen months after DO the mandibular body was found to have greater growth than the ramus. (5) Evaluating changes in three dimensions provides an improved understanding of the growth pattern and distraction effects on the mandible and its structural components. (6) Additional studies on the effect of mandibular distraction on other conditions involving mandibular deformities are required. In addition, the effect of various distracter devices should also be evaluated. Three-dimensional evaluation is recommended for improved accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 486
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Longitudinal results of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia
    Huisinga-Fischer, CE
    Vaandrager, JM
    Prahl-Andersen, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (06) : 924 - 933
  • [2] Three-Dimensional Preoperative Design of Distraction Osteogenesis for Hemifacial Microsomia
    Chen, Ying
    Niu, Feng
    Yu, Bing
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Wang, Meng
    Gui, Lai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (01) : 184 - 188
  • [3] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with multidirectional extraoral distraction device in hemifacial microsomia patients: Three-dimensional treatment planning, prediction tracings, and case outcomes
    Tharanon, W
    Sinn, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (03) : 202 - 213
  • [4] Bidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of goldenhar variant of hemifacial microsomia: A case report
    Walker, DA
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 575 - 581
  • [5] Growth observation and orthodontic treatment of a hemifacial microsomia patient treated with distraction osteogenesis
    Chung, Nam Hyung
    Yang, So Jin
    Kang, Jae Yoen
    Jeon, Young-Mi
    Kim, Jong Ghee
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 50 (02) : 136 - 144
  • [6] Three-dimensional functional unit analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandible—a preliminary report
    Choi J.W.
    Kim B.H.
    Kim H.S.
    Yu T.H.
    Kim B.C.
    Lee S.-H.
    [J]. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 37 (1)
  • [7] The effects of distraction osteogenesis on mandibular growth in growing minipigs: A report on three-dimensional morphologic changes
    Chang, HH
    Tseng, H
    Hsieh, TMH
    Huang, CY
    Chen, YH
    Hsu, CY
    Cheng, WM
    Chen, MH
    Chen, SR
    Yao, CCJ
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (07) : 2014 - 2024
  • [8] A 3-Dimensional Evaluation of the Effects of Unilateral Vertical Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis on Airway Volume Among Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia
    Pak, Sarah
    Bous, Rany M.
    Acosta Lenis, Claudia
    Kumar, Anand R.
    Valiathan, Manish
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024, 61 (07): : 1157 - 1163
  • [9] Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Mandibular Bone Regenerated By Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Zapata, Uriel
    Zakhary, Ibrahim
    Nagy, William W.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 89 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [10] Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Mandibular Bone Regenerated By Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Elias Kontogiorgos
    Mohammed E. Elsalanty
    Uriel Zapata
    Ibrahim Zakhary
    William W. Nagy
    Paul C. Dechow
    Lynne A. Opperman
    [J]. Calcified Tissue International, 2011, 89