Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution

被引:158
|
作者
Passeport, Elodie [1 ]
Hunt, William F. [1 ]
Line, Daniel E. [1 ]
Smith, Ryan A. [1 ]
Brown, Robert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
URBAN STORMWATER; NORTH-CAROLINA; RAIN GARDEN; REMOVAL; RETENTION; NITROGEN; SITES; MEDIA; FLOW;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Two grassed bioretention cells including internal storage zones (ISZs) were monitored for 16 months in central North Carolina. Each cell had a surface area of 106 m(2) and fill media depths were 0.75 and 1.05 m for the north (North) and the south (South) cells, respectively. Asphalt parking lot inflow and outflows were analyzed for nitrogen and phosphorus forms and fecal coliform (FC). Outflow volumes and peak flows for individual storms were generally less than those of inflow. Overall, except for NO2,3-N, effluent nitrogen species event mean concentrations (EMCs) and loads were significantly (alpha=0.05) lower than those of the inflow, and nitrogen species load reductions ranged from 47 to 88%. Apart from fall and winter, during which a longer hydraulic contact time seemed to be needed, the ISZs appeared to improve denitrification. Total phosphorus (TP) and OPO4-P EMCs were significantly lower than those of the inlet. Reductions were 58% (South) and 63% (North) for TP and 78% (North) and 74% (South) for OPO4-P. There was no significant difference in TP and OPO4-P loads between the inlet and the two outlets. Moreover, effluent concentrations for both phosphorus species were low, relative to other studies. The best nutrient EMC and load reductions occurred during the warm and humid seasons. When considering effluent concentrations in addition to removal rates, the grassed cells showed promising results for FC and nutrient pollution abatement when compared to conventionally vegetated bioretention (trees, shrubs, and mulch) previously studied in North Carolina.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 510
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation
    DeBusk, K. M.
    Wynn, T. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2011, 137 (09): : 800 - 808
  • [2] Study proves Minnesota rainwater gardens reduce storm-water runoff
    Trimbath, Karen
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2006, 76 (12): : 28 - 30
  • [3] Roofing materials' contributions to storm-water runoff pollution
    Clark, Shirley E.
    Steele, Kelly A.
    Spicher, Julia
    Siu, Christina Y. S.
    Lalor, Melinda M.
    Pitt, Robert
    Kirby, Jason T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (05) : 638 - 645
  • [4] Study on Storm-Water Management of Grassed Swales and Permeable Pavement Based on SWMM
    Xie, Jianguang
    Wu, Chenghao
    Li, Hua
    Chen, Gengtian
    [J]. WATER, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [5] Field Evaluation of Storm-Water Control Measures for Highway Runoff Treatment
    Winston, Ryan J.
    Hunt, William F.
    Kennedy, Shawn G.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Lauffer, Matthew S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (01) : 101 - 111
  • [6] Multiple-event study of bioretention for treatment of urban storm water runoff
    Hsieh, CH
    Davis, AP
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 51 (3-4) : 177 - 181
  • [7] Liquid Water Transport in Porous Metal Foam Flow-Field Fuel Cells: A Two-Phase Numerical Modelling and Ex-Situ Experimental Study
    Fly, Ashley
    Kim, Kyoungyoun
    Gordon, John
    Butcher, Daniel
    Chen, Rui
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (07)