Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:157
|
作者
Peters, Ruth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Booth, Andrew [4 ]
Rockwood, Kenneth [5 ]
Peters, Jean [4 ]
D'Este, Catherine [6 ,7 ]
Anstey, Kaarin J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[7] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; LIFE-STYLE BEHAVIORS; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; VASCULAR RISK; METABOLIC SYNDROME; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; OLDER-ADULTS; CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PREDICTING RISK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022846
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitive decline and dementia. All abstracts and full text were screened independently by two reviewers and each article assessed for bias using a standard checklist. A fixed effects meta-analysis was undertaken. Data sources Databases Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from 1999 to 2017. Eligibility criteria For inclusion articles were required to report longitudinal data from participants free of cognitive decline at baseline, with formal assessment of cognitive function or dementia during follow-up, and an aim to examine the impact of additive or clustered comorbid risk factor burden in with two or more core modifiable risk factors. Results Seventy-nine full-text articles were examined. Twenty-two articles (18 studies) were included reporting data on > 40 000 participants. Included studies consistently reported an increased risk associated with greater numbers of intraindividual risk factors or unhealthy behaviours and the opposite for healthy or protective behaviours. A meta-analysis of studies with dementia outcomes resulted in a pooled relative risk for dementia of 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.39) for one risk factor, 1.65 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.94) for two and 2.21 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.73) for three or more, relative to no risk factors. Limitations include dependence on published results and variations in study outcome, cognitive assessment, length of follow-up and definition of risk factor exposure. Conclusions The strength of the reported associations, the consistency across studies and the suggestion of a dose response supports a need to keep modifiable risk factor exposure to a minimum and to avoid exposure to additional modifiable risks. Further research is needed to establish whether particular combinations of risk factors confer greater risk than others.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stephan, Blossom C. M.
    Cochrane, Louie
    Kafadar, Aysegul Humeyra
    Brain, Jacob
    Burton, Elissa
    Myers, Bronwyn
    Brayne, Carol
    Naheed, Aliya
    Anstey, Kaarin J.
    Ashor, Ammar W.
    Siervo, Mario
    LANCET HEALTHY LONGEVITY, 2024, 5 (06): : e406 - e421
  • [2] Modifiable risk factors for glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoshikawa, Marcia Harumy
    Rabelo, Nicollas Nunes
    Telles, Joao Paulo Mota
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [3] Modifiable risk factors for glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marcia Harumy Yoshikawa
    Nícollas Nunes Rabelo
    João Paulo Mota Telles
    Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [4] Modifiable risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ji, Xi
    Leng, Xin-Yi
    Dong, Yi
    Ma, Ya-Hui
    Xu, Wei
    Cao, Xi-Peng
    Hou, Xiao-He
    Dong, Qiang
    Tan, Lan
    Yu, Jin-Tai
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (22)
  • [5] Midlife Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 34 Prospective Cohort Studies
    Li, Xiao-Ying
    Zhang, Min
    Xu, Wei
    Li, Jie-Qiong
    Cao, Xi-Peng
    Yu, Jin-Tai
    Tan, Lan
    CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH, 2019, 16 (14) : 1254 - 1268
  • [6] Public knowledge of the influence of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors on dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Parial, Laurence Lloyd
    Lam, Simon Ching
    Ho, Janice Yuen Shan
    Suen, Lorna K. P.
    Leung, Angela Yee Man
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 25 (08) : 1395 - 1409
  • [7] Dominant and Modifiable Risk Factors for Dementia in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ojagbemi, Akin
    Okekunle, Akinkunmi Paul
    Babatunde, Opeyemi
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] Modifiable risk factors for colorectal serrated polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bailie, Lesley
    Loughrey, Maurice
    Coleman, Helen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 2 - 2
  • [9] Modifiable risk factors for patellar tendinopathy in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sprague, Andrew L.
    Smith, Angela H.
    Knox, Patrick
    Pohlig, Ryan T.
    Silbernagel, Karin Gravare
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 52 (24) : 1575 - +
  • [10] MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS FOR SERRATED COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bailie, L.
    Loughrey, M. B.
    Coleman, H. G.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A368 - A368