Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Portable PM2.5 Monitor for Mobile Deployment

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, Mingjian [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Weichang [3 ]
Cao, Chang [1 ,2 ]
Buehler, Colby [4 ,5 ]
Gentner, Drew R. [4 ,5 ]
Lee, Xuhui [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Yale NUIST Ctr Atmospher Environm, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Key Lab Agr Meteorol, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Environm, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Environm, Solut Energy Air Climate & Hlth SEARCH, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
low-cost sensor; air quality; hotspot; public health; portable monitor; crowdsourcing; URBAN AIR-QUALITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; PARTICLE NUMBER; BLACK CARBON; POLLUTION; RESOLUTION; SENSORS; EMISSIONS; EXPOSURE; AMBIENT;
D O I
10.3390/s22072767
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is known to vary spatially across a city landscape. Current networks of regulatory air quality monitoring are too sparse to capture these intra-city variations. In this study, we developed a low-cost (60 USD) portable PM2.5 monitor called Smart-P, for use on bicycles, with the goal of mapping street-level variations in PM2.5 concentration. The Smart-P is compact in size (85 x 85 x 42 mm) and light in weight (147 g). Data communication and geolocation are achieved with the cyclist's smartphone with the help of a user-friendly app. Good agreement was observed between the Smart-P monitors and a regulatory-grade monitor (mean bias error: -3.0 to 1.5 mu g m(-3) for the four monitors tested) in ambient conditions with relative humidity ranging from 38 to 100%. Monitor performance decreased in humidity > 70% condition. The measurement precision, represented as coefficient of variation, was 6 to 9% in stationary mode and 6% in biking mode across the four tested monitors. Street tests in a city with low background PM2.5 concentrations (8 to 9 mu g m(-3)) and in two cities with high background concentrations (41 to 74 mu g m(-3)) showed that the Smart-P was capable of observing local emission hotspots and that its measurement was not sensitive to bicycle speed. The low-cost and user-friendly nature are two features that make the Smart-P a good choice for empowering citizen scientists to participate in local air quality monitoring.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Mobile Settings
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Wang, An
    Machida, Yuki
    Duhl, Tiffany
    Mora, Simone
    Kumar, Prashant
    Kahn, Ralph
    Ratti, Carlo
    Durant, John L.
    Hudda, Neelakshi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (41) : 15401 - 15411
  • [2] Design and evaluation of a portable PM2.5 monitor featuring a low-cost sensor in line with an active filter sampler
    Tryner, Jessica
    Quinn, Casey
    Windom, Bret C.
    Volckens, John
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (08) : 1403 - 1415
  • [3] Development and On-Field Testing of Low-Cost Portable System for Monitoring PM2.5 Concentrations
    Genikomsakis, Konstantinos N.
    Galatoulas, Nikolaos-Fivos
    Dallas, Panagiotis I.
    Ibarra, Luis Miguel Candanedo
    Margaritis, Dimitris
    Ioakimidis, Christos S.
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (04)
  • [4] Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring
    Badura, Marek
    Batog, Piotr
    Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta
    Modzel, Piotr
    JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018
  • [5] Calibration of a low-cost PM2.5 monitor using a random forest model
    Wang, Yanwen
    Du, Yanjun
    Wang, Jiaonan
    Li, Tiantian
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 133
  • [6] A low-cost particulate matter (PM2.5) monitor for wildland fire smoke
    Kelleher, Scott
    Quinn, Casey
    Miller-Lionberg, Daniel
    Volckens, John
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (02) : 1087 - 1097
  • [7] Publicly available low-cost sensor measurements for PM2.5 exposure modeling: Guidance for monitor deployment and data selection
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Carmona, Nancy
    Blanco, Magali N.
    Gassett, Amanda J.
    Seto, Edmund
    Szpiro, Adam A.
    V. Larson, Timothy
    Sampson, Paul D.
    Kaufman, Joel D.
    Sheppard, Lianne
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 158
  • [8] One year evaluation of three low-cost PM2.5 monitors
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Rice, Jessica
    Koehler, Kirsten
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 235
  • [9] Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site
    Feenstra, Brandon
    Papapostolou, Vasileios
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Zhang, Hang
    Boghossian, Berj Der
    Cocker, David
    Polidori, Andrea
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 216