Controlling the joint local false discovery rate is more powerful than meta-analysis methods in joint analysis of summary statistics from multiple genome-wide association studies

被引:16
|
作者
Jiang, Wei [1 ]
Yu, Weichuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
EFFECT SIZE; HERITABILITY; GWAS; PHENOTYPES; GENOTYPES; DATABASE; BIOLOGY; DBGAP;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btw690
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: In genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of common diseases/traits, we often analyze multiple GWASs with the same phenotype together to discover associated genetic variants with higher power. Since it is difficult to access data with detailed individual measurements, summary-statistics-based meta-analysis methods have become popular to jointly analyze datasets from multiple GWASs. Results: In this paper, we propose a novel summary-statistics-based joint analysis method based on controlling the joint local false discovery rate (Jlfdr). We prove that our method is the most powerful summary-statistics-based joint analysis method when controlling the false discovery rate at a certain level. In particular, the Jlfdr-based method achieves higher power than commonly used meta-analysis methods when analyzing heterogeneous datasets from multiple GWASs. Simulation experiments demonstrate the superior power of our method over meta-analysis methods. Also, our method discovers more associations than meta-analysis methods from empirical datasets of four phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiethnic Joint Analysis of Marginal Summary Statistics from Genome-wide Association Studies
    Shen, Jiayi
    Jiang, Lai
    Wang, Kan
    Newcombe, Paul J.
    Haiman, Chris
    Conti, David V.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 45 (07) : 789 - 789
  • [2] Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond
    Evangelos Evangelou
    John P. A. Ioannidis
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2013, 14 : 379 - 389
  • [3] Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond
    Evangelou, Evangelos
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2013, 14 (06) : 379 - 389
  • [4] Optimal Methods for Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Zhou, Baiyu
    Shi, Jianxin
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 35 (07) : 581 - 591
  • [5] The meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
    Thompson, John R.
    Attia, John
    Minelli, Cosetta
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 12 (03) : 259 - 269
  • [6] Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies
    Zeggini, E.
    Ioannidis, J. P. A.
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2009, 10 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [7] Meta-analysis on genome-wide association studies on heart rate variability
    de Geus, Eco J.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2017, 79 (04) : A155 - A156
  • [8] Meta-Analysis of Multiple Regression Models in Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Vaitsiakhovich, T.
    Becker, T.
    [J]. HUMAN HEREDITY, 2015, 79 (01) : 47 - 47
  • [9] Covariate-modulated local false discovery rate for genome-wide association studies
    Zablocki, Rong W.
    Schork, Andrew J.
    Levine, Richard A.
    Andreassen, Ole A.
    Dale, Anders M.
    Thompson, Wesley K.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 30 (15) : 2098 - 2104
  • [10] Handling Multiple Testing in Local Statistics of Spatial Association by Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Comparative Analysis
    He, Zhanjun
    Liu, Qiliang
    Deng, Min
    Xu, Feng
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA ANALYSIS (ICBDA), 2017, : 684 - 687