Spine-board transfer techniques and the unstable cervical spine

被引:44
|
作者
Del Rossi, G
Horodyski, M
Heffernan, TP
Powers, ME
Siders, R
Brunt, D
Rechtine, GR
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Educ, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Greenville, NC USA
[5] Univ Florida, Comp & Informat Sci & Engn Dept, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
cervical spine; spinal column injury; spine board; prehospital care; log-roll; lift-and-slide;
D O I
10.1097/01.BRS.0000116986.48166.D0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A repeated-measures design using a cadaveric model was used in this preliminary investigation on the effectiveness of spine-board transfer techniques. Objectives. To compare the amount of angulation (flexion - extension) motion that results at the cervical spine during the execution of the log-roll maneuver and the lift-and-slide technique; and to examine how changes to the integrity of the cervical spine impacts the amount of motion generated during the transfer process. Summary of Background Data. Very little research has been performed to establish the efficacy of spine-board transfer techniques. Early studies have indicated that the log-roll maneuver may not be appropriate for transferring victims with thoracolumbar injuries. Also, there has not been a single study that has reported the impact of transfer techniques on the unstable cervical spine. This lack of data necessitated the present study. Methods. Four groups ( with six participants each) were asked to execute the log-roll maneuver and the lift-and-slide technique on five cadavers. An electromagnetic motion analysis device was used to assess the amount of angulation motion generated at the C5 - C6 segment during the execution of these transfer techniques. To examine how changes to the integrity of the cervical spine impacts the amount of motion that is produced during the transfer process, flexion - extension motion was assessed under various conditions: across a stable C5 - C6 segment, after the creation of a posterior ligamentous injury, and after a complete segmental injury. Results. No significant differences in angulation motion were noted between transfer techniques. However, significant differences were noted between all three injury conditions. That is, as the severity of the injury increased, the average amount of angulation motion produced at the site of the lesion also increased, regardless of technique. Conclusion. The participants of this study were able to restrict flexion-extension motion equally well with the-log-roll maneuver as with the lift-and-slide technique. However, more research is needed to fully ascertain the effectiveness of spine-board transfer techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:E134 / E138
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of spine-board transfer techniques and the effect of training on performance
    Del Rossi, G
    Horodyski, M
    Powers, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2003, 38 (03) : 204 - 208
  • [2] Controlled Laboratory Comparison Study of Motion With Football Equipment in a Destabilized Cervical Spine Three Spine-Board Transfer Techniques
    Prasarn, Mark L.
    Horodyski, MaryBeth
    DiPaola, Matthew J.
    DiPaola, Christian P.
    Del Rossi, Gianluca
    Conrad, Bryan P.
    Rechtine, Glenn R., II
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (09):
  • [3] Motion in the Unstable Cervical Spine When Transferring a Patient Positioned Prone to a Spine Board
    Conrad, Bryan P.
    Marchese, Diana L.
    Rechtine, Glenn R.
    Prasarn, Mark
    Del Rossi, Gianluca
    Horodyski, MaryBeth H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2013, 48 (06) : 797 - 803
  • [4] A comparison of head movement during back boarding by motorized spine-board and log-roll techniques
    Swartz, EE
    Nowak, J
    Shirley, C
    Decoster, LC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2005, 40 (03) : 162 - 168
  • [5] PAIN AND TISSUE-INTERFACE PRESSURES DURING SPINE-BOARD IMMOBILIZATION
    CORDELL, WH
    HOLLINGSWORTH, JC
    OLINGER, ML
    STROMAN, SJ
    NELSON, DR
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [6] CERVICAL SPINE MOTION DURING TRANSFER AND STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES
    Shrier, Ian
    Boissy, Patrick
    Lebel, Karina
    Boulay, John
    Segal, Eli
    Delaney, J. Scott
    Vacon, L. Charlene
    Steele, Russell J.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2015, 19 (01) : 116 - 125
  • [7] Injection techniques in the cervical spine
    Artner, J.
    Cakir, B.
    Reichel, H.
    Lattig, F.
    [J]. SCHMERZ, 2012, 26 (06): : 699 - +
  • [8] PADDED VS UNPADDED SPINE BOARD FOR CERVICAL-SPINE IMMOBILIZATION
    WALTON, R
    DESALVO, JF
    ERNST, AA
    SHAHANE, A
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 2 (08) : 725 - 728
  • [9] INTERNAL FIXATION OF UNSTABLE RHEUMATOID CERVICAL SPINE
    CREGAN, JCF
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1966, 25 (03) : 242 - &
  • [10] THE UNSTABLE OCCULT CERVICAL-SPINE FRACTURE
    RHEE, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1992, 10 (06): : 612 - 613