共 1 条
Hazard Perception and Prediction test for walking, riding a bike and driving a car: "Understanding of the global traffic situation"
被引:12
|作者:
Castro, Candida
[1
]
Muela, Ismael
[1
]
Doncel, Pablo
[1
]
Garcia-Fernandez, Pedro
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Psychol, Mind Brain & Behav Res Ctr, CIMCYC, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Elect & Comp Sci Dept, Fac Sci, Granada, Spain
来源:
关键词:
ROAD USERS;
BICYCLISTS;
EXPERIENCE;
ABILITIES;
AWARENESS;
HAPPENS;
SAFETY;
NOVICE;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0238605
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
To "put oneself in the place of other road users" may improve understanding of the global traffic situation. It should be useful enabling drivers to anticipate and detect obstacles in time to prevent accidents to other road users, especially those most vulnerable. We created a pioneering Hazard Perception and Prediction test to explore this skill in different road users (pedestrians, cyclists and drivers), with videos recorded in naturalistic scenarios: walking, riding a bicycle and driving a car. There were 79 participants (30 pedestrians, 14 cyclists, 13 novice drivers and 22 experienced drivers). Sixty videos of hazardous traffic situations were presented, divided into 2 blocks of 30 videos each: 10 walking, 10 riding a bicycle, 10 driving a car. In each situation presented, we evaluated the performance of the participants carrying out the task of predicting the hazard and estimating the risk. In the second block, after they had carried out the task, we gave them feedback on their performance and let them see the whole video (i.e., checking what happened next). The results showed that the holistic test had acceptable psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .846). The test was able to discriminate between the different conditions manipulated: a) between traffic hazards recorded from different perspectives: walking, riding a bicycle and driving a car; b) between participants with different user profiles: pedestrians, cyclists and drivers; c) between the two test blocks: the first evaluation only and the second combining evaluation with this complex intervention. We found modal bias effects in both Hazard Perception and Prediction; and in Risk Estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文