Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques

被引:192
|
作者
Krambeck, Amy E. [2 ]
DiMarco, David S. [2 ]
Rangel, Laureano J. [3 ]
Bergstralh, Eric J. [3 ]
Myers, Robert P. [2 ]
Blute, Michael L. [2 ]
Gettman, Matthew T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; laparoscopy; surgery; robotics; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess the perioperative complications and early oncological results in a comparative study matching open radical retropubic (RRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) groups. From August 2002 to December 2005 we identified 294 patients undergoing RARP for clinically localized prostate cancer. A comparison RRP group of 588 patients from the same period was matched 2:1 for surgical year, age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade. Perioperative complications were compared. Patients completed a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire. Pathological features were assessed and Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical progression-free survival (PFS) were compared. There was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications between the RARP and RRP groups (8.0% vs 4.8%, P = 0.064). Wound herniation was more common after RARP (1.0% vs none, P = 0.038), and development of bladder neck contracture was more common after RRP (1.2% vs 4.6%; P < 0.018). The hospital stay was less after RARP (29.3% vs 19.4%, P = 0.004, for a stay of 1 day). At the 1-year follow-up there was no significant difference in continence (RARP 91.8%, RRP 93.7%, P = 0.344) or potency (RARP 70.0%, RRP 62.8%, P = 0.081) rates. The biochemical PFS was no different between treatments at 3 years (RARP 92.4%, RRP 92.2%; P = 0.69). There was no significant difference in overall early complication, long-term continence or potency rates between the RARP and RRP techniques. Furthermore, early oncological outcomes were similar, with equivalent margin positivity and PFS between the groups.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 453
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA: A MATCHED COMPARISON OF OPEN RETROPUBIC AND ROBOT-ASSISTED TECHNIQUES
    Hertzig, Lindsay
    Frank, Igor
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Boorjian, Stephen
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Tollefson, Matthew
    Bergstralh, Eric
    Rangel, Laureano
    Gettman, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E730 - E731
  • [2] Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: Matched comparison of retropubic and robot assisted techniques
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    DiMarco, David S.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 555 - 556
  • [3] Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: Matched comparison of retropubic and robot assisted techniques
    Krambeck, A. E.
    Blute, M. L.
    DiMarco, D. S.
    Slezak, J. M.
    Berstralh, E. J.
    Gettman, M. T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A102 - A102
  • [4] Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Pe, Mark L.
    Thumar, Adeep B.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Lee, Franklin C.
    McCue, Peter
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (07) : 1136 - 1140
  • [5] Comparison of oncological results and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy techniques retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted
    Prilepskaya, E. A.
    Maltsev, E. G.
    Kolontarev, K. B.
    Govorov, A. V.
    Rasner, P. I.
    Vasilyev, A. O.
    Sadchenko, A. V.
    Dyakov, V. V.
    Pushkar, D. U.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2015, 11 (04): : 54 - 58
  • [6] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy in obese patients.
    Le, C. Q.
    Slezak, J. M.
    Ho, K. V.
    Gettman, M. T.
    Blute, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A224 - A224
  • [7] Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, Florian R.
    Krupski, Tracey L.
    Sun, Leon
    Albala, David M.
    Price, Marva M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Tewari, Alok K.
    Moul, Judd W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) : 785 - 793
  • [8] Satisfaction and Regret After Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, F. R.
    Krupski, T. L.
    Sun, L.
    Albala, D. M.
    Price, M. M.
    Polascik, T. J.
    Robertson, C. N.
    Tewari, A. K.
    Moul, J. W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 635 - 636
  • [9] A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    D'Alonzo, Richard C.
    Gan, Tong J.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Albala, David M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Sun, Leon
    Dahm, Philipp
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2009, 21 (05) : 322 - 328
  • [10] Comparison of Continence Recovery Between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience
    Son, Seung Jun
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Byun, Seok Soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (09) : 598 - 602