Estuarine Dissolved Organic Carbon Flux From Space: With Application to Chesapeake and Delaware Bays

被引:13
|
作者
Signorini, Sergio R. [1 ,2 ]
Mannino, Antonio [1 ]
Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M. [3 ]
St-Laurent, Pierre [3 ]
Wilkin, John [4 ]
Tabatabai, Aboozar [4 ]
Najjar, Raymond G. [5 ]
Hofmann, Eileen E. [6 ]
Da, Fei [3 ]
Tian, Hanqin [7 ,8 ]
Yao, Yuanzhi [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] William & Mary, Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Gloucester Point, VA USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Marine & Coastal Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Meteorol & Atmospher Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Ocean Earth & Atmospher Sci, Ctr Coastal Phys Oceanog, Norfolk, VA USA
[7] Auburn Univ, Int Ctr Climate & Global Change Res, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[8] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Estuarine DOC export; DOC retrieval from ocean color; DOC from neural network model; seasonal and interannual variability of estuarine DOC export; Chesapeake Bay; Mid-Atlantic Bight; NET ECOSYSTEM METABOLISM; LARGE CONTINENTAL-SHELF; EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA; INORGANIC CARBON; ATLANTIC-OCEAN; TIDAL EXCHANGE; RIVER-ESTUARY; MASS-BALANCE; MATTER; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1029/2018JC014646
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
This study uses a neural network model trained with in situ data, combined with satellite data and hydrodynamic model products, to compute the daily estuarine export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at the mouths of Chesapeake Bay (CB) and Delaware Bay (DB) from 2007 to 2011. Both bays show large flux variability with highest fluxes in spring and lowest in fall as well as interannual flux variability (0.18 and 0.27 Tg C/year in 2008 and 2010 for CB; 0.04 and 0.09 Tg C/year in 2008 and 2011 for DB). Based on previous estimates of total organic carbon (TOCexp) exported by all Mid-Atlantic Bight estuaries (1.2 Tg C/year), the DOC export (CB+DB) of 0.3 Tg C/year estimated here corresponds to 25% of the TOCexp. Spatial and temporal covariations of velocity and DOC concentration provide contributions to the flux, with larger spatial influence. Differences in the discharge of fresh water into the bays (74 billion m(3)/year for CB and 21 billion m(3)/year for DB) and their geomorphologies are major drivers of the differences in DOC fluxes for these two systems. Terrestrial DOC inputs are similar to the export of DOC at the bay mouths at annual and longer time scales but diverge significantly at shorter time scales (days to months). Future efforts will expand to the Mid-Atlantic Bight and Gulf of Maine, and its major rivers and estuaries, in combination with coupled terrestrial-estuarine-ocean biogeochemical models that include effects of climate change, such as warming and CO2 increase. Plain Language Summary This study combines satellite data, field work observations, and statistical and numerical models to investigate the seasonal and interannual variability of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from two major East Coast estuaries, Chesapeake, and Delaware Bays. DOC is a food supplement, supporting growth of microorganisms and plays an important role in the global carbon cycle through the microbial loop, a marine pathway which incorporates DOC into the food chain. Using this novel methodology, we were able to better quantify the combined contribution of these estuaries to the East Coast carbon budget and contrast estuarine properties affecting the DOC export, such as riverine inputs, time scales of variability, and geomorphology. The combined DOC contribution of these two estuaries represents 25% of the total organic carbon exported by all Mid-Atlantic Bight (the coastal region running from Massachusetts to North Carolina) estuaries, and 27% of the total atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake in the Mid-Atlantic Bight.
引用
收藏
页码:3755 / 3778
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CARBON FLUX IN PEARL RIVER ESTUARINE BAYS
    韩舞鹰
    林洪瑛
    [J]. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 1990, (02) : 150 - 157
  • [2] Chromophoric dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic carbon in Chesapeake Bay
    Rochelle-Newall, EJ
    Fisher, TR
    [J]. MARINE CHEMISTRY, 2002, 77 (01) : 23 - 41
  • [3] BACTERIAL USE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC-CARBON FROM CAROLINA BAYS
    LEFF, LG
    BURCH, JL
    MCARTHUR, JV
    [J]. AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1991, 126 (02): : 308 - 316
  • [4] Dissolved and particulate organic carbon in Chesapeake Bay
    Thomas R. Fisher
    James D. Hagy
    Emma Rochelle-Newall
    [J]. Estuaries, 1998, 21 : 215 - 229
  • [5] Dissolved and particulate organic carbon in Chesapeake Bay
    Fisher, TR
    Hagy, JD
    Rochelle-Newall, E
    [J]. ESTUARIES, 1998, 21 (02): : 215 - 229
  • [6] FLUXES OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC-CARBON FROM CHESAPEAKE BAY SEDIMENTS
    BURDIGE, DJ
    HOMSTEAD, J
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1994, 58 (16) : 3407 - 3424
  • [7] Photobleaching of dissolved organic material from a tidal marsh-estuarine system of the Chesapeake Bay
    Tzortziou, Maria
    Osburn, Christopher L.
    Neale, Patrick J.
    [J]. PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2007, 83 (04) : 782 - 792
  • [8] Flux of dissolved organic carbon from UK rivers
    Worrall, F.
    Burt, T. P.
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2007, 21 (01)
  • [9] Dynamics of dissolved organic carbon and total dissolved nitrogen in Maryland's coastal bays
    Duan, Shuiwang
    Chen, Nianhong
    Kaushal, Sujay S.
    Chigbu, Paulinus
    Ishaque, Ali
    May, Eric
    Oseji, Ozuem F.
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2015, 164 : 451 - 462
  • [10] The dissolved organic carbon flux from the UK - A new Bayesian approach to flux calculation
    Worrall, Fred
    Howden, Nicholas J. K.
    Burt, Tim P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590