Don't Use a Bifactor Model Unless You Believe the True Structure Is Bifactor

被引:17
|
作者
Decker, Scott L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychol, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
factor analysis < measurement; intelligence; cognition; intelligence models; assessment; INTELLIGENCE; CHALLENGES; 2ND-ORDER; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1177/0734282920977718
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The current article provides a response to concerns raised by Dombrowski, McGill, Canivez, Watkins, & Beaujean (2020) regarding the methodological confounds identified by Decker, Bridges, Luedke, and Eason (2020) for using a bifactor (BF) model and Schmid-Leiman (SL) procedure in previous studies supporting a general factor of intelligence (i.e., "g"). While Dombrowski et al. (2020) raised important theoretical and practical issues, the theoretical justification for using a BF model and SL procedure to identify cognitive dimensions remain unaddressed, as well as significant concerns for using these statistical methods as the basis for informing the use of cognitive tests in clinical applications.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 49
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条