A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer

被引:173
|
作者
Steed, H [1 ]
Rosen, B [1 ]
Murphy, J [1 ]
Laframboise, S [1 ]
De Petrillo, D [1 ]
Covens, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hlth Network, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol,Div Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
early cervical cancer; laparoscopic-assisted radi; al vaginal hysterectomy; peri-operative morbidity; recurrence-free survival;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative morbidity and recurrence-free survival of early-stage cervical cancer patients treated by laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) with time-matched radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) controls at our center. Methods. Since July 1984, all patients with FIGO stage 1A/1B cervical cancer undergoing radical surgery by members of our division have been entered into a prospective database. Since November 1996, one surgeon at our center has performed LARVH on all surgically appropriate patients. Non-parametric tests were used. Differences between medians were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Statistical analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate disease-free survival. Differences between survival curves were compared with the log rank test. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Results. Between November 1996 and December 2003, 71 and 205 patients have undergone LARVH and RAH, respectively, for FIGO stage IA/IB carcinoma of the cervix. Both groups were similar with respect to age and Quetelet index. There were no differences in tumor size, histology, grade, depth of invasion, lymph node metastases, or surgical margins. All laparoscopic procedures were completed successfully with no conversions to laparotomy. Intra-operative morbidity characteristics analyzed (LARVH vs. RAH) were blood loss 300 ml vs. 500 ml (P < 0.001), operative time 3.5 h vs. 2.5 h (P < 0.001), and intra-operative complications 13% vs. 4% (P < 0.03). Intraoperative complications in the LARVH group included: cystotomy (7), ureteric injury (1), and bowel injury (1). There was no difference in transfusion rates. There was no difference between post-operative infectious and non-infectious complications (LARVH vs. RAH), 9% vs. 5% and 5% vs. 2%, respectively. The median time to normal urine residual was 10 days vs. 5 days (P < 0.001), and the median length of hospital stay was 1 day vs. 5 days (P < 0.001). Twenty-two percent of patients received post-operative radiotherapy for high-risk features in both groups. After a median follow-up of 17 and 21 months, there have been 4 recurrences in the LARVH group and 13 in the RAH (P = NS). The overall 2-year recurrence-free survival was 94% and 94% in the LARVH and RAH groups, respectively (P = NS). Conclusion. Our data demonstrate that early cervical cancer can be treated successfully with LARVH with similar efficacy and recurrence rates to RAH. The major benefits are less intra-operative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. It is a safe procedure with low overall morbidity and complication rates. However, at present, LARVH is associated with an increase in intra-operative complications, and patients may have an increased time to return to normal bladder function. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 593
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer
    Kucukmetin, Ali
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    Naik, Raj
    Bryant, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (10):
  • [2] Comparison of Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    Kim, Ha-Jeong
    Song, Taejong
    Kim, Min-Kyu
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Kim, Byoung-Gie
    Bae, Duk-Soo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (12) : 3839 - 3848
  • [3] Comparison of Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
    Chel Hun Choi
    Jeong-Won Lee
    Yoo-Young Lee
    Ha-Jeong Kim
    Taejong Song
    Min-Kyu Kim
    Tae-Joong Kim
    Byoung-Gie Kim
    Duk-Soo Bae
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 3839 - 3848
  • [4] Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer
    Roy, M
    Plante, M
    Renaud, MC
    Tetu, B
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (03) : 336 - 339
  • [5] Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer A retrospective study
    Zhang, Sichen
    Ma, Linlin
    Meng, Qing Wei
    Zhou, Dan
    Moyiding, Tuerhongayi
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (36)
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY (TLRH) VERSUS LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY (LAVRH) FOR CERVICAL CANCER TREATMENT
    Bartusevicius, A.
    Bartuseviciene, E.
    Kucinskaite, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 702 - 702
  • [7] Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study
    Jackson, KS
    Das, N
    Naik, R
    Lopes, AD
    Godfrey, KA
    Hatem, MH
    Monaghan, JM
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (03) : 655 - 661
  • [8] Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Nina
    Jin, Xiangshu
    Yang, Wen
    Gu, Chenglei
    Li, Li'an
    Xu, Jia
    Tang, Qiting
    Fan, Wensheng
    Meng, Yuanguang
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [9] Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study
    Nina Zhang
    Xiangshu Jin
    Wen Yang
    Chenglei Gu
    Li’an Li
    Jia Xu
    Qiting Tang
    Wensheng Fan
    Yuanguang Meng
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21
  • [10] A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Frumovitz, Michael
    dos Reis, Ricardo
    Sun, Charlotte C.
    Brown, Jubilee
    Milam, Michael R.
    Bevers, Michael
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (03) : S25 - S25