Science Operations Planning Optimization for Spacecraft Formation Flying Maneuvers

被引:1
|
作者
Burgon, R. [1 ]
Roberts, P. C. E. [1 ]
Roberts, J. A. [2 ]
Ankersen, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Space Res Ctr, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Aon Ltd, Aon Space, London EC2M 4PL, England
[3] ESA, Control Syst Anal Guidance Nav & Control Syst, NL-2200 Noordwijk, Netherlands
关键词
ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2514/1.40490
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The use of formation flying of distributed space systems, especially for space-based interferometry, is receiving much attention by mission designers. Optimal maneuver planning for these missions is critical to ensure the safe operation of the spacecraft and to maximize the mission science returns. One such mission, Darwin, requires complex observation scheduling complicated by a number of interconnected temporal constraints placed on the mission. Following a defined maneuver planning architecture this paper introduces a science operations planner that helps maximize observation time through science operations schedule optimization. Comparison of this method with a simple benchmark planner is given and shows that schedule performance increases of up to 12% can be achieved. Though these increases can only be achieved using significantly more computational resources than the benchmark planner, they are found using constraints that would allow the planner to be able to operate autonomously onboard one of the formation spacecraft.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 644
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of Low-Thrust Reconfiguration Maneuvers for Spacecraft Flying in Formation
    Massari, Mauro
    Bernelli-Zazzera, Franco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2009, 32 (05) : 1629 - 1638
  • [2] Maneuver planning optimization for spacecraft formation flying missions
    Ross Burgon
    Peter C. E. Roberts
    Jennifer A. Roberts
    Finn Ankersen
    [J]. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2008, 56 : 545 - 571
  • [3] Maneuver planning optimization for spacecraft formation flying missions
    Burgon, Ross
    Roberts, Peter C.E.
    Roberts, Jennifer A.
    Ankersen, Finn
    [J]. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2008, 56 (04): : 545 - 571
  • [4] Maneuver Planning Optimization for Spacecraft Formation Flying Missions
    Burgon, Ross
    Roberts, Peter C. E.
    Roberts, Jennifer A.
    Ankersens, Finn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 56 (04): : 545 - 571
  • [5] Optimal path planning for spacecraft formation flying:TB Planning architecture and operations
    Burgon, Ross
    Roberts, Jennifer A.
    Roberts, Peter C. E.
    [J]. ASTRODYNAMICS 2007, PTS I-III, 2008, 129 : 2685 - +
  • [6] Spacecraft formation flying reconfiguration with extended and impulsive maneuvers
    Di Mauro, G.
    Spiller, D.
    Bevilacqua, R.
    D'Amico, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2019, 356 (06): : 3474 - 3507
  • [7] Linearizing assumptions and control design for spacecraft formation flying maneuvers
    Kappagantula, KC
    Crassidis, JL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPACE FLIGHT DYNAMICS, 2004, 548 : 423 - 428
  • [8] Deep space formation flying spacecraft path planning
    Sultan, Cornel
    Seereram, Sanjeev
    Mehra, Raman K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2007, 26 (04): : 405 - 430
  • [9] Continuous maneuvers for spacecraft formation flying reconfiguration using relative orbit elements
    Di Mauro, G.
    Bevilacqua, R.
    Spiller, D.
    Sullivan, J.
    D'Amico, S.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2018, 153 : 311 - 326
  • [10] Review on Relative Trajectory Optimization Methods for Spacecraft Formation Flying
    Chen, Danhe
    He, Jingyuan
    Liu, Xingchuan
    Liao, Wenhe
    [J]. Yuhang Xuebao/Journal of Astronautics, 2024, 45 (03): : 325 - 340