Attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons: a review

被引:19
|
作者
Hall, Sue [1 ]
Reid, Erin [1 ]
Marteau, Theresa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Guys Hosp, Dept Psychol,Hlth Psychol Sect, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
review; attitudes; sex selection;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1472
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Early non-invasive fetal sexing is widely available over the Internet, leading to concerns about its possible use for sex selection. The aim of this review is to summarise the results of surveys describing lay attitudes towards sex selection for non-medical reasons to help address or inform such concerns. A search of electronic databases and key journals was supplemented by an Internet search and citation-tracking. Twenty-one quantitative studies were identified. Most were conducted in the US, with five recent studies in the UK and Germany. Most studies found that, overall, people were not in favour of sex selection. However, this varied from 94 to 18%. People may hold more negative attitudes when the method of sex selection is specified, particularly if this involves termination of pregnancy (TOP). Attitudes towards the general availability of sex selection are less negative than those towards personal use. Attitudes were consistently negative in German surveys. Little is known of such attitudes outside the US, the UK and Germany, and how such attitudes may change as new sex selection technologies become available. Studies of use of early non-invasive fetal sexing for sex selection for non-medical reasons are needed to assess the extent to which concerns about usage are justified and to assist in debates on how these might be most appropriately addressed. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ethical objections to sex selection for non-medical reasons
    Blyth, Eric
    Frith, Lucy
    Crawshaw, Marilyn
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 : 41 - 45
  • [2] Gender selection for non-medical reasons
    Gleicher, N
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, : 55 - 59
  • [3] Preconception sex selection for non-medical and intermediate reasons: ethical reflections
    de Wert, G.
    Dondorp, W.
    [J]. FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2010, 2 (04): : 267 - 277
  • [4] US doctors say sex selection acceptable for non-medical reasons
    Gottlieb, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7317): : 828 - 828
  • [5] Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from the UK
    Dahl, E
    Hinsch, KD
    Beutel, M
    Brosig, B
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) : 2238 - 2239
  • [6] The categorical ban on sex selection for non-medical reasons is in need of urgent reconsideration
    Dondorp, W. J.
    De Wert, G. M. W. R.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I224 - I224
  • [7] Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: a representative survey from Germany
    Dahl, E
    Beutel, M
    Brosig, B
    Hinsch, KD
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (10) : 2231 - 2234
  • [8] Sex selection for non-medical purposes
    Milliez, J. M.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 : 114 - 117
  • [9] ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons
    Dondorp, W.
    De Wert, G.
    Pennings, G.
    Shenfield, F.
    Devroey, P.
    Tarlatzis, B.
    Barri, P.
    Diedrich, K.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (06) : 1448 - 1454
  • [10] Non-medical sex selection: ethical issues
    Strange, Heather
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 94 (01) : 7 - 20